A-SK wrote:No, no, and no!! Mehmet Topal and Cisse rarely ever score from set pieces nor do they position themselves all the brilliantly in the box, so why on earth should i downgrade Selcuk. Selcuk is one our key men from set pieces and is one of the only players scoring regularly from set pieces, but the figures you're giving me would suggest otherwise Have you not even noticed his aggression? With 68, he'll rarely ever make runs into box and will only pop into box from set pieces. He won't charge into box frequently anyways, so why should i downgrade his attack aswell. Ernst has only managed to score one goal so far but Selcuk has been scoring like a striker this season, so who has a better positional sense? How can you compare Ernst to Selcuk when Ernst has only spent a few week playing in the Turkish league, ridiculous!!
A-SK wrote::shock: That picture proves nothing! Ersnt is lying on Selcuk's back like a big fag Deniz, do you ever stop to even test the stats? I'm guessing not. I've tested the first post and it plays like the real thing. Selcuk is stronger than Edu but not as much as Lugano. Lugano physically dominates over the majority of attackers whilst Selcuk keeps the midfielders under control. If you ever stop to watch him, he literally barges people off the ball. Selcuk weighs as much as Nobre and Holosko so what make sthem any stronger? Nothing. You're just looking for a bone to pick! Try the stats and then come back to me. Selcuk is stronger than the majority of players in fenerbahce so i'm not gonna drop it because you posted some stupid irrelevant picture. 86 makes him sit accordingly on every balance ladder on the database and don't think i havent looked. Strength is the only asset he has, why should i downgrade to a value like 83/84 when i know that'll make him flimsy? Atleast explain me that much. I'm happy to raise Hakan's balance, but atleast explain yourself.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests