lo zio regarding Quaresma's Dribbling and Technique wrote:- dribbling - once again pretty good.... but once again, as soon as u take a look at his rolemates in serie a, the perspective changes. as a matter of fact, taddei, rosina, camoranesi, di natale, palladino, gasbarroni, santana... they're all way better than him in dribbling.
- technique - everybody keep talking about quaresma's touch.... but why? on wich basis people keep considenring him as a player with a "silky touch"? When i think about wingers or supporting strikers with great technique my mind goes simao, rosina, cozza, miccoli, pato, menez, cerci.... and i'm not even mentioning those who have a "top class" technique like ronaldo, di natale, taddei or camoranesi, as they're just too far from quaresma.
well all those guys i mentioned before have such a better touch than quaresma, there's not even competition.
jmg721 wrote:I think it is possible Taddei's greatly underrated in the 1st post. I'm not sure if crisfar's stats even give his Dribbling and Tech ability credit.....if he is in the class of Ronaldo, Di Natali and Camoranesi.....
Rfuna wrote:I can't agree Taddei's in the class of Di Natali and Camoranesi. As for Quaremsa, I can't believe what I'm hearing. I'm starting to wonder about lo zio or whoever it is you're quoting. Quaresma is far better than Taddei, ATLEAST 5pts better in both technqiue and DA, without a doubt.
lo zio wrote:anyhow i know i was harsh on quaresma (afterall i also remarked i didn't watch him enough to properly rate him and that my opinion about him is not completely reliable). i would understand if someone would tell me that quaresma is "still better than the likes of defendi, lazzari and langella" (he's definitely not better than the other ones i mentioned however).... and i'm aware of the troubles a player can find changing team, league, country.
but let's be honest. he didn't move from portugal to england. even though milano is not the most "italianish" city, serie a is still a "latin-oriented" league (the pace is a compromise between liga and epl, the game is less frenentic than the english one, the players use their brains as much as their legs)....
the formation aswell was perfect for him (at least at the beginning, but then again, the latter formation change was due precisely to quaresma's and mancini's poor performances, so he can't really compain about that)... he didn't have to change his role, neither his approach to the game (as dossena had to do, for instance)....
to make it simple what i meant to say is: the adaptation factor has to be taken into account.... but it can't bring us to say that this guy has the potential to become like ronaldo coz that's just not true (i can't even imagine him ever getting close to camoranesi's standards, let alone the ballon d'or).
jmg721 wrote:..anything else need to get updated?
Alex_10 wrote:jmg721 wrote:..anything else need to get updated?
a substantial TW and CONS increase
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests