Keith Gillespie | 1996-1998


Moderators: lucashag, Adrien, Albo7, Korinov, Brezza, jurgens

Forum rules
User avatar
PES Stats Database
PSD Backbone
Posts: 21343
Joined: 2008 Dec 09, 12:06
Been thanked: 595 times

Keith Gillespie | 1996-1998

Postby PES Stats Database » 2012 Nov 24, 22:04

Image

Club: Newcastle United


Last edited by frshmn on 2013 Apr 02, 21:02, edited 10 times in total.
frshmn
Regular Poster
Posts: 416
Joined: 2011 Apr 16, 22:45
Has thanked: 122 times
Been thanked: 97 times

Re: Keith GILLESPIE | 1996-1998

Postby frshmn » 2012 Nov 29, 17:08

REAL_MADRID wrote:Att: 78. Agree. The 79 value seems a bit high for a WG, specially if you compare him with some current wingers.
Bal: 77. Also agree, there isn't too much difference between the inicial value and these, but probably a 77 suits him better. BAL was one of the weak points of this player, so the 77 looks good, and even an 76 value wouldn't be crazy, but I prefer the 77.
I'm not very sure about his speed values, feel free and give the values you prefer. But don't you think the 93 value for TS could be a bit overdone?
The same with AGI, and TECH. An +-1 retouch ins't a very big difference, so feel free and give the value that you prefer. But probably I would leave his AGI at least in yellow numbers.


Just some comments by REAL_MADRID on initial values that I'd assigned Gillespie... In general, there's nothing too major. The 93 value for TS that REAL_MADRID's referring to is a suggestion of mine, and yeah, as he pointed out, it might be slightly overdone. I'm willing to concede that I might be going slightly overboard, but anyone who's watched the Newcastle-Barca game of '98 knows that he absolutely burned Sergi for pace the whole game - as it stands, Sergi's got a 92 TS and his set's been worked on only recently.

Current TECH value might be overdone. He had a pretty solid first touch, but it's nothing you can't replicate with a slightly lower value.
Last edited by frshmn on 2012 Nov 30, 21:26, edited 2 times in total.
His TS is 83, big deal. Arguing for 79 is whiny.
jurgens
Clear
Posts: 10444
Joined: 2009 Jul 19, 15:33
Has thanked: 2661 times
Been thanked: 1407 times

Re: Keith GILLESPIE | 1996-1998

Postby jurgens » 2012 Nov 29, 21:54

Thanks a lot for this set, very nice work. Saw a little of him recently, but the only thing I really noticed was his speed, which did seem to be really crazy.
frshmn
Regular Poster
Posts: 416
Joined: 2011 Apr 16, 22:45
Has thanked: 122 times
Been thanked: 97 times

Re: Keith GILLESPIE | 1996-1998

Postby frshmn » 2012 Dec 23, 22:13

jurgens wrote:Thanks a lot for this set, very nice work. Saw a little of him recently, but the only thing I really noticed was his speed, which did seem to be really crazy.


Sorry for the late reply but I was watching some more footage of him yesterday and, yeah, he's fast as hell, especially on the ball. Could see him bordering the orange values, at the very least.
His TS is 83, big deal. Arguing for 79 is whiny.

Return to “90's”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest