Nicolas Anelka


Moderator: Mod's

Forum rules
User avatar
PES Stats Database
PSD Backbone
Posts: 21620
Joined: 2008 Dec 09, 12:06
Been thanked: 601 times

Nicolas Anelka

Postby PES Stats Database » 2008 Dec 09, 11:21


Last edited by Vickingo on 2015 May 14, 16:27, edited 3 times in total.
ravlee

Re: Nicolas ANELKA

Postby ravlee » 2008 Dec 15, 03:37

i think 82 for DS is a bit harsh for him .. maybe 84?!
FDA192
PSD Youth League
Posts: 63
Joined: 2008 Dec 13, 13:56

Re: Nicolas ANELKA

Postby FDA192 » 2008 Dec 15, 18:31

Agreed.
PMC
PSD Guru
Posts: 5731
Joined: 2008 Dec 08, 19:51
Location: Vienna
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 6 times
Contact:

Re: Nicolas ANELKA

Postby PMC » 2008 Dec 15, 18:55

what about BB? don't you think hes stronger than that?
I'm against you
dixie1sixty
Regular Poster
Posts: 308
Joined: 2008 Dec 11, 14:48

Re: Nicolas ANELKA

Postby dixie1sixty » 2008 Dec 15, 19:05

I think his SA should be raised to 88/89 his finishing has always been spot on and this season he has proved just how prolific he is.
One Evertonian Is Worth Twenty Liverpudlians
Paddy
PSD Guru
Posts: 8353
Joined: 2008 Dec 08, 20:01
Has thanked: 23 times
Been thanked: 142 times

Re: Nicolas ANELKA

Postby Paddy » 2008 Dec 19, 13:43

dixie1sixty wrote:I think his SA should be raised to 88/89 his finishing has always been spot on and this season he has proved just how prolific he is.


he has *Scoring so no.

PMC wrote:what about BB? don't you think hes stronger than that?


definately, i gave him 83 in my set of stats in the old thread but i guess 84/85 wouldn't go amiss here
RB7
Veteran Stat Maker
Posts: 1157
Joined: 2008 Dec 08, 19:54
Location: Portugal
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Nicolas ANELKA

Postby RB7 » 2008 Dec 19, 20:00

Paddy wrote:
dixie1sixty wrote:I think his SA should be raised to 88/89 his finishing has always been spot on and this season he has proved just how prolific he is.


he has *Scoring so no.

PMC wrote:what about BB? don't you think hes stronger than that?


definately, i gave him 83 in my set of stats in the old thread but i guess 84/85 wouldn't go amiss here


Scoring is only to make him look more for goal, to be sure he won't pass the ball instead of scoring.. that's not what he does at all..
It only makes him try much more, doesnt make him any better at finishing.. But yeah he's already two points over guys like Torres, Robbie Keane or Berbatov..
SPORTING CLUB PORTUGAL
TheTrueSeto
Regular Poster
Posts: 332
Joined: 2008 Dec 14, 10:27

Re: Nicolas ANELKA

Postby TheTrueSeto » 2008 Dec 20, 14:00

I thought *scoring* does affect shooting stats :?
dixie1sixty
Regular Poster
Posts: 308
Joined: 2008 Dec 11, 14:48

Re: Nicolas ANELKA

Postby dixie1sixty » 2008 Dec 20, 14:08

i still think he should be higher regardless
One Evertonian Is Worth Twenty Liverpudlians
PMC
PSD Guru
Posts: 5731
Joined: 2008 Dec 08, 19:51
Location: Vienna
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 6 times
Contact:

Re: Nicolas ANELKA

Postby PMC » 2008 Dec 20, 14:12

again, is he really that weak for an 1.87 guy?
I'm against you
TheTrueSeto
Regular Poster
Posts: 332
Joined: 2008 Dec 14, 10:27

Re: Nicolas ANELKA

Postby TheTrueSeto » 2008 Dec 20, 14:15

After taking a look at the ladders, maybe it could go up to at most 84
bald777

Re: Nicolas ANELKA

Postby bald777 » 2008 Dec 20, 21:08

are his shots really as powerful as petrov and babel?
dixie1sixty
Regular Poster
Posts: 308
Joined: 2008 Dec 11, 14:48

Re: Nicolas ANELKA

Postby dixie1sixty » 2008 Dec 21, 00:34

bald777 wrote:are his shots really as powerful as petrov and babel?


Yeah they are IMO its just you dont often see Anelka shoot from distance hes usually bearing down on goal and only needs to place his shots rather than smack them.
One Evertonian Is Worth Twenty Liverpudlians
GavidTreveguet
New Stat Maker
Posts: 144
Joined: 2008 Dec 10, 20:14

Re: Nicolas ANELKA

Postby GavidTreveguet » 2008 Dec 21, 02:18

HitMan
Seasoned Stat Maker
Posts: 738
Joined: 2008 Dec 15, 23:59

Re: Nicolas ANELKA

Postby HitMan » 2008 Dec 28, 11:51

RB7 wrote:
Paddy wrote:
dixie1sixty wrote:I think his SA should be raised to 88/89 his finishing has always been spot on and this season he has proved just how prolific he is.


he has *Scoring so no.

PMC wrote:what about BB? don't you think hes stronger than that?


definately, i gave him 83 in my set of stats in the old thread but i guess 84/85 wouldn't go amiss here


Scoring is only to make him look more for goal, to be sure he won't pass the ball instead of scoring.. that's not what he does at all..
It only makes him try much more, doesnt make him any better at finishing.. But yeah he's already two points over guys like Torres, Robbie Keane or Berbatov..



then i guess this is wrong
*SCORING

The Scoring special ability helps players to shoot more accurately when not directly facing the goal, and generally improves the accuracy of all shots.

??
The old guard making room for the NEW guard...FORZA GIOVINCO

non football related: www.zeitgeisttrailer.com and WATCH ZEITGEIST ADDENDUM

visit: www.thezeitgeistmovement.com

and most importantly visit: www.thevenusproject.com
pietja
New Stat Maker
Posts: 134
Joined: 2009 Feb 20, 15:00

Re: Nicolas ANELKA

Postby pietja » 2009 Feb 20, 15:27

I would give him BB 83, i think that for example a 4 point gap between him and Tevez is to much.

Ohh, and about Scoring ability. I'm almost certain that it improves shooting when not directly facing the goal as well as shooting under pressure. You can tell that from the game, imo.
Playboy
New Stat Maker
Posts: 209
Joined: 2008 Dec 25, 11:50

Re: Nicolas ANELKA

Postby Playboy » 2009 Feb 21, 15:25

defense and passing is just ridiculous ,.. who gave him those stats ?

today against Aston Villa he was playing much in midfield even going back to the end several times to help Ferreira out.
kendees
Seasoned Stat Maker
Posts: 545
Joined: 2008 Dec 09, 16:05
Location: Píšť, Czech republic
Contact:

Re: Nicolas ANELKA

Postby kendees » 2009 Feb 21, 17:23

Defence: 35
Body balance: 84
SPA/SPS/LPA/LPS: 71/72/70/71
Mentality: 70

What I have to say? There's no need some explanations I think. I don't say he is a hardworking player, but he isn't really a lazy one, as 64 makes him. He tracks back sometimes, and 70 looks like a reasonable suggestion. Atleast I hope in it. Passing isn't on playmakers' level, but he can make a final pass, surely his short passing is a bit better, but he isn't useless neither in carrying the game on the other side. About defence, similiar suggestion like in mentality. His positioning isn't only in the tip, but he goes for the ball to the depth of the pitch. 35 isn't high number, I think it's an avarege number for a striker like him and he deserves it IMO. That's all what I want to say and what I wanna suggest.
Last edited by kendees on 2009 Feb 21, 20:22, edited 1 time in total.
I know that i don't know anything.
PMC
PSD Guru
Posts: 5731
Joined: 2008 Dec 08, 19:51
Location: Vienna
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 6 times
Contact:

Re: Nicolas ANELKA

Postby PMC » 2009 Feb 21, 19:58

I still think he needs a raise in BB... I usually advocate the opposite but in his case its different... I actually don't think that he's weaker than Henry
I'm against you
kendees
Seasoned Stat Maker
Posts: 545
Joined: 2008 Dec 09, 16:05
Location: Píšť, Czech republic
Contact:

Re: Nicolas ANELKA

Postby kendees » 2009 Feb 21, 20:21

I agree with you, PMC. Not sure if he could be on the same level as Henry, for me he could be one point lesser. 84 is my final number for BB and I addded it to my suggestions.
I know that i don't know anything.

Return to “Retired Players”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests