Charlie Adam


Moderators: BigStu, anOKguy, Welbeck19, Jez, Brahms, Phil, Mod's

Forum rules
User avatar
PES Stats Database
PSD Football Expert
Posts: 18491
Joined: 2008 Dec 09, 12:06

Charlie Adam

Postby PES Stats Database » 2009 Jul 22, 15:08


Last edited by tuco55 on 2012 Dec 29, 13:48, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Brezza
PSD Loyalty Program Member
Posts: 2277
Joined: 2008 Dec 08, 23:57

Re: Charlie ADAM

Postby Brezza » 2012 Jan 25, 20:45

I'd rate his long pass speed in the low 90's.
Mr. Evans
PSD Loyalty Program Member
Posts: 2790
Joined: 2010 Nov 03, 10:58

Re: Charlie ADAM

Postby Mr. Evans » 2012 Jan 25, 20:50

I agree, something like a 91 would suit him.
thor34 wrote:JUMP: 80/81/82. Digestible methionine and leap up to splice the header. From what I saw the half-length coat will easily to Angeleri.
tasmin
PSD Loyalty Program Member
Posts: 2102
Joined: 2010 Jul 26, 04:14
Location: Out of this world

Re: Charlie ADAM

Postby tasmin » 2012 Jan 26, 01:30

playing much better
vamos arriba la celeste !
BigStu
PSD Football Expert
Posts: 7937
Joined: 2009 May 28, 16:43
Location: England

Re: Charlie ADAM

Postby BigStu » 2012 Jan 30, 21:35

I definitely wrote a post disagreeing to the orange LPS, and I've checked and I also disagree with the prior 87....and if he must sit one such a high value larsson must be raised to a similar value
CR7
Seasoned Stat Maker
Posts: 644
Joined: 2011 Mar 31, 15:57

Re: Charlie ADAM

Postby CR7 » 2012 Mar 03, 20:02

His free kicks/corners are absolutely putrid. I'd say 79 is enough. Giggs' free kicks/corner are usually poor but even he's never put straight out of play at the near post. LPA should also come down to about 81. When he gets into crossing positions, they are usually good crosses. But his general long passes are wild and inconsistent.
People gon' be people. They gon' lie, they gon' cheat, they gon' steal, but as long you get yours, you keep it moving.
Kerry
PSD Loyalty Program Member
Posts: 2283
Joined: 2011 May 06, 11:07

Re: Charlie ADAM

Postby Kerry » 2012 Aug 31, 11:52

Image
mracho wrote: Well, then he/she was an idiom with a T at the end.


Farés L'arrogante Image
Jez
PSD Loyalty Program Member
Posts: 3672
Joined: 2009 Feb 23, 00:51
Location: Ingerland
Contact:

Re: Charlie ADAM

Postby Jez » 2012 Aug 31, 15:04

Was he ever this quick...? Or am I doing him an injustice?
"DEBT IS THE ROAD TO RUIN" David Gill August 2004

My blog is back, check it out! www.mybeautifulgame1.wordpress.com
CR7
Seasoned Stat Maker
Posts: 644
Joined: 2011 Mar 31, 15:57

Re: Charlie ADAM

Postby CR7 » 2012 Aug 31, 15:12

CR7 wrote:His free kicks/corners are absolutely putrid. I'd say 79 is enough. Giggs' free kicks/corner are usually poor but even he's never put straight out of play at the near post. LPA should also come down to about 81. When he gets into crossing positions, they are usually good crosses. But his general long passes are wild and inconsistent.

I stand by these.
People gon' be people. They gon' lie, they gon' cheat, they gon' steal, but as long you get yours, you keep it moving.
User avatar
Korinov
PSD Loyalty Program Member
Posts: 4458
Joined: 2011 Aug 31, 20:50
Location: Weasel store

Re: Charlie ADAM

Postby Korinov » 2012 Sep 22, 21:13

He has certainly some speed on the ball, I'd say the current TS/DS combo is probably deserved, at least in terms of DS. Other things however... do not see him this agile, and LPA looks really really overdone. That 81 suggestion doesn't look very far off really.

And his shooting looks shite.
Image Korinov la Komadreja
Spoiler: show
jurgens wrote:korinov clearly jinxed atletico. jealous of their succes he struck with kind words laced with hispanic voodoo.
amine wrote:Spanish vodoo is real. That’s my takeaway from this. When my gran children ask me about it, i’ll tell them about the era of xosé the great
efgen
New Stat Maker
Posts: 207
Joined: 2010 Nov 23, 11:57
Contact:

Re: Charlie ADAM

Postby efgen » 2012 Nov 27, 06:25

Adam reanimated. And the main reason I can see that he was playing a lot closer to Peter Crouch than at the beginning of the season, at the urging of coach.
The team adapts to the appearance of a playmaker, whom the "Stoke" he has never happened

add AMF
efgen
New Stat Maker
Posts: 207
Joined: 2010 Nov 23, 11:57
Contact:

Re: Charlie ADAM

Postby efgen » 2012 Dec 03, 00:42

ignore :(
vinnie
PSD Loyalty Program Member
Posts: 4033
Joined: 2012 Apr 06, 03:11
Location: ♛      

Re: Charlie ADAM

Postby vinnie » 2012 Dec 03, 00:54

sorry efgen, haven't watched much stoke since the first two weeks of the season. I don't believe i know enough about him to be able to agree or disagree with you, so i'm being cautious to not do anything when i don't know enough to be justified in doing it.

Maybe some other mod knows him and can deal with your comments. If you post clips showing what you mean it's easier for me to build a perspective.
If you don't put effort into your post, i won't put effort in my response.
Diego
PSD Loyalty Program Member
Posts: 2299
Joined: 2011 Jul 16, 16:54

Re: Charlie ADAM

Postby Diego » 2012 Dec 03, 01:12

Neeeeds a Pic

Option 1
Spoiler: show
Image


Option 2
Spoiler: show
Image


Option 3
Spoiler: show
Image


I vote for the first one, DAT LEGS (but okay, the second one is good too).
bam!
efgen
New Stat Maker
Posts: 207
Joined: 2010 Nov 23, 11:57
Contact:

Re: Charlie ADAM

Postby efgen » 2012 Dec 03, 03:17

But why clips include any game, he is now playing for pure striker :)
vinnie
PSD Loyalty Program Member
Posts: 4033
Joined: 2012 Apr 06, 03:11
Location: ♛      

Re: Charlie ADAM

Postby vinnie » 2012 Dec 03, 04:23

so add what position? AMF?
If you don't put effort into your post, i won't put effort in my response.
efgen
New Stat Maker
Posts: 207
Joined: 2010 Nov 23, 11:57
Contact:

Re: Charlie ADAM

Postby efgen » 2012 Dec 03, 04:36

Let's wait a little while. I just tabled. I do not want to impose anything, just stating a fact that he is now playing a striker. SS or AMF. But let's change the once you see him play :)
efgen
New Stat Maker
Posts: 207
Joined: 2010 Nov 23, 11:57
Contact:

Re: Charlie ADAM

Postby efgen » 2012 Dec 07, 19:49

Yes, all the same it is necessary to add AMF. Already I can safely say it is!
anOKguy
Veteran Stat Maker
Posts: 1212
Joined: 2014 Dec 14, 16:53

Re: Charlie Adam

Postby anOKguy » 2019 Apr 30, 18:44

Something like this now:

Attack: 64*
Defence: 62*
Balance: 81
Stamina: 75
Top Speed: 68
Acceleration: 70
Response: 72
Agility: 66
Dribble Accuracy: 77
Dribble Speed: 72
Short Pass Accuracy: 75
Short Pass Speed: 83
Long Pass Accuracy: 78
Long Pass Speed: 86
Shot Accuracy: 68
Shot Power: 85
Shot Technique: 70
Free Kick Accuracy: 75
Curling: 77
Header: 68
Jump: 70
Technique: 79
Aggression: 80
Mentality: 72
Keeper Skills: 50
Teamwork: 82
jurgens
PSD Football Expert
Posts: 10067
Joined: 2009 Jul 19, 15:33

Re: Charlie Adam

Postby jurgens » 2019 Apr 30, 18:50

Are you just making random decreases? I havn't watched adam in years, but he was in 90's for passing in his prime, erratic, but a clear high tier passer. You just don't lose that, it doesn't happen, you can get a little worse, but you don't drop from 90's to green.
anOKguy
Veteran Stat Maker
Posts: 1212
Joined: 2014 Dec 14, 16:53

Re: Charlie Adam

Postby anOKguy » 2019 Apr 30, 19:17

He didn’t drop from 90s to green. He’s forcing a lot more stuff than he used to and connecting less. Much more static of a player as well and it’s him trying to spring passes while not moving too much, making it worse. He can still hit excellent long balls, but these are my impressions so far. I noted in another that Stoke stuff is preliminary and I’ll circle back to them soon and watch even more. Check what happened with Huddleston for instance though. Relatively similar in regression with Adams

Return to “Reading FC”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests