Charlie Adam


Moderators: BigStu, Phil, Jez, Welbeck19, Brahms, Mod's

Forum rules
User avatar
PES Stats Database
Posts: 18234
Joined: 2008 Dec 09, 12:06
Been thanked: 451 times

Charlie Adam

Postby PES Stats Database » 2009 Jul 22, 15:08


Last edited by tuco55 on 2012 Dec 29, 13:48, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Brezza
Posts: 2277
Joined: 2008 Dec 08, 23:57
Has thanked: 12 times
Been thanked: 21 times

Re: Charlie ADAM

Postby Brezza » 2012 Jan 25, 20:45

I'd rate his long pass speed in the low 90's.
Mr. Evans
Posts: 2790
Joined: 2010 Nov 03, 10:58
Been thanked: 7 times

Re: Charlie ADAM

Postby Mr. Evans » 2012 Jan 25, 20:50

I agree, something like a 91 would suit him.
thor34 wrote:JUMP: 80/81/82. Digestible methionine and leap up to splice the header. From what I saw the half-length coat will easily to Angeleri.
tasmin
Posts: 2102
Joined: 2010 Jul 26, 04:14
Location: Out of this world
Has thanked: 14 times
Been thanked: 16 times

Re: Charlie ADAM

Postby tasmin » 2012 Jan 26, 01:30

playing much better
vamos arriba la celeste !
BigStu
Posts: 7951
Joined: 2009 May 28, 16:43
Location: England
Has thanked: 162 times
Been thanked: 214 times

Re: Charlie ADAM

Postby BigStu » 2012 Jan 30, 21:35

I definitely wrote a post disagreeing to the orange LPS, and I've checked and I also disagree with the prior 87....and if he must sit one such a high value larsson must be raised to a similar value
CR7
Posts: 644
Joined: 2011 Mar 31, 15:57
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Charlie ADAM

Postby CR7 » 2012 Mar 03, 20:02

His free kicks/corners are absolutely putrid. I'd say 79 is enough. Giggs' free kicks/corner are usually poor but even he's never put straight out of play at the near post. LPA should also come down to about 81. When he gets into crossing positions, they are usually good crosses. But his general long passes are wild and inconsistent.
People gon' be people. They gon' lie, they gon' cheat, they gon' steal, but as long you get yours, you keep it moving.
Kerry
Posts: 2283
Joined: 2011 May 06, 11:07
Has thanked: 76 times
Been thanked: 60 times

Re: Charlie ADAM

Postby Kerry » 2012 Aug 31, 11:52

Image
mracho wrote: Well, then he/she was an idiom with a T at the end.


Farés L'arrogante Image
Jez
Posts: 3675
Joined: 2009 Feb 23, 00:51
Location: Ingerland
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 17 times
Contact:

Re: Charlie ADAM

Postby Jez » 2012 Aug 31, 15:04

Was he ever this quick...? Or am I doing him an injustice?
"DEBT IS THE ROAD TO RUIN" David Gill August 2004

My blog is back, check it out! www.mybeautifulgame1.wordpress.com
CR7
Posts: 644
Joined: 2011 Mar 31, 15:57
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Charlie ADAM

Postby CR7 » 2012 Aug 31, 15:12

CR7 wrote:His free kicks/corners are absolutely putrid. I'd say 79 is enough. Giggs' free kicks/corner are usually poor but even he's never put straight out of play at the near post. LPA should also come down to about 81. When he gets into crossing positions, they are usually good crosses. But his general long passes are wild and inconsistent.

I stand by these.
People gon' be people. They gon' lie, they gon' cheat, they gon' steal, but as long you get yours, you keep it moving.
User avatar
Korinov
Posts: 4458
Joined: 2011 Aug 31, 20:50
Location: Weasel store
Has thanked: 207 times
Been thanked: 418 times

Re: Charlie ADAM

Postby Korinov » 2012 Sep 22, 21:13

He has certainly some speed on the ball, I'd say the current TS/DS combo is probably deserved, at least in terms of DS. Other things however... do not see him this agile, and LPA looks really really overdone. That 81 suggestion doesn't look very far off really.

And his shooting looks shite.
Image Korinov la Komadreja
Spoiler: show
jurgens wrote:korinov clearly jinxed atletico. jealous of their succes he struck with kind words laced with hispanic voodoo.
amine wrote:Spanish vodoo is real. That’s my takeaway from this. When my gran children ask me about it, i’ll tell them about the era of xosé the great
efgen
Posts: 207
Joined: 2010 Nov 23, 11:57
Been thanked: 12 times
Contact:

Re: Charlie ADAM

Postby efgen » 2012 Nov 27, 06:25

Adam reanimated. And the main reason I can see that he was playing a lot closer to Peter Crouch than at the beginning of the season, at the urging of coach.
The team adapts to the appearance of a playmaker, whom the "Stoke" he has never happened

add AMF
efgen
Posts: 207
Joined: 2010 Nov 23, 11:57
Been thanked: 12 times
Contact:

Re: Charlie ADAM

Postby efgen » 2012 Dec 03, 00:42

ignore :(
vinnie
Posts: 4033
Joined: 2012 Apr 06, 03:11
Location: ♛      
Has thanked: 758 times
Been thanked: 1123 times

Re: Charlie ADAM

Postby vinnie » 2012 Dec 03, 00:54

sorry efgen, haven't watched much stoke since the first two weeks of the season. I don't believe i know enough about him to be able to agree or disagree with you, so i'm being cautious to not do anything when i don't know enough to be justified in doing it.

Maybe some other mod knows him and can deal with your comments. If you post clips showing what you mean it's easier for me to build a perspective.
If you don't put effort into your post, i won't put effort in my response.
Diego
Posts: 2299
Joined: 2011 Jul 16, 16:54
Has thanked: 102 times
Been thanked: 21 times

Re: Charlie ADAM

Postby Diego » 2012 Dec 03, 01:12

Neeeeds a Pic

Option 1
Spoiler: show
Image


Option 2
Spoiler: show
Image


Option 3
Spoiler: show
Image


I vote for the first one, DAT LEGS (but okay, the second one is good too).
bam!
efgen
Posts: 207
Joined: 2010 Nov 23, 11:57
Been thanked: 12 times
Contact:

Re: Charlie ADAM

Postby efgen » 2012 Dec 03, 03:17

But why clips include any game, he is now playing for pure striker :)
vinnie
Posts: 4033
Joined: 2012 Apr 06, 03:11
Location: ♛      
Has thanked: 758 times
Been thanked: 1123 times

Re: Charlie ADAM

Postby vinnie » 2012 Dec 03, 04:23

so add what position? AMF?
If you don't put effort into your post, i won't put effort in my response.
efgen
Posts: 207
Joined: 2010 Nov 23, 11:57
Been thanked: 12 times
Contact:

Re: Charlie ADAM

Postby efgen » 2012 Dec 03, 04:36

Let's wait a little while. I just tabled. I do not want to impose anything, just stating a fact that he is now playing a striker. SS or AMF. But let's change the once you see him play :)
efgen
Posts: 207
Joined: 2010 Nov 23, 11:57
Been thanked: 12 times
Contact:

Re: Charlie ADAM

Postby efgen » 2012 Dec 07, 19:49

Yes, all the same it is necessary to add AMF. Already I can safely say it is!
Oklahomastate010
Posts: 1092
Joined: 2014 Dec 14, 16:53
Has thanked: 464 times
Been thanked: 405 times

Re: Charlie Adam

Postby Oklahomastate010 » 2019 Apr 30, 18:44

Something like this now:

Attack: 64*
Defence: 62*
Balance: 81
Stamina: 75
Top Speed: 68
Acceleration: 70
Response: 72
Agility: 66
Dribble Accuracy: 77
Dribble Speed: 72
Short Pass Accuracy: 75
Short Pass Speed: 83
Long Pass Accuracy: 78
Long Pass Speed: 86
Shot Accuracy: 68
Shot Power: 85
Shot Technique: 70
Free Kick Accuracy: 75
Curling: 77
Header: 68
Jump: 70
Technique: 79
Aggression: 80
Mentality: 72
Keeper Skills: 50
Teamwork: 82
jurgens
Posts: 10034
Joined: 2009 Jul 19, 15:33
Has thanked: 2055 times
Been thanked: 1151 times

Re: Charlie Adam

Postby jurgens » 2019 Apr 30, 18:50

Are you just making random decreases? I havn't watched adam in years, but he was in 90's for passing in his prime, erratic, but a clear high tier passer. You just don't lose that, it doesn't happen, you can get a little worse, but you don't drop from 90's to green.
Oklahomastate010
Posts: 1092
Joined: 2014 Dec 14, 16:53
Has thanked: 464 times
Been thanked: 405 times

Re: Charlie Adam

Postby Oklahomastate010 » 2019 Apr 30, 19:17

He didn’t drop from 90s to green. He’s forcing a lot more stuff than he used to and connecting less. Much more static of a player as well and it’s him trying to spring passes while not moving too much, making it worse. He can still hit excellent long balls, but these are my impressions so far. I noted in another that Stoke stuff is preliminary and I’ll circle back to them soon and watch even more. Check what happened with Huddleston for instance though. Relatively similar in regression with Adams

Return to “Stoke City FC”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests