scr1899 wrote:Even if he'll play as a SB his main position is still WF.
Right, Calleklein. If I have seen it right, 58 makes him the weakest SB in defending of the league, which is ok so far as his strengths will definitely be more in offense. But we really have to have a minimum def level, so 58 for now is a good choice for a "new" SB.
monKevski wrote:He's still a taught WF and SB is not his preferred position!
I think in the national he won't play as a SB, right?
And about BB: As you said he's tall, but with 77kg not so strong, but if give even a lower value, he would be still weaker than he actually is.
monKevski wrote:I'm for waiting for some games in the Bundesliga, I'd like to see him playing more there.
But I doubt that what you said about him and the national team, Austria has enough Side Backs on the right side and they need him more forward than in the defence in my eyes.
In my opinion we should for some games to see him on the SB position before drawing any conclusions.
Paddy wrote:58 is far from a weak value for a SB*
PMC wrote:Paddy wrote:58 is far from a weak value for a SB*
well... theres not many SBs around with such a value though
58 is a value I'd give to guys who are "wingbacks" for example
PMC wrote:in his case... I wouldn't really do something about it before the season starts and we see him in a real match. I mean a romanian coach used 2 midfielders as forwards in a game vs Fc Köln just for the sake of it and I wouldn't classify either of them now as a CF.
Let's see if he'll play there in competetive games 1st
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest