Paddy wrote:I don't know why people think his defensive rating should go up... he's perfect on 83 imo
If he's so good, why are Milan struggling with defensive options? Why is Bonera always fielded as SB rather in the middle in place of Senderos? This guy is very average at best, Milan deserve better. Just lower Kaladze instead of increasing Bonera.metronomo wrote:i think he should have an improvement (better than lowering kaladze)
Attack: 56 ---> 59 (when he plays as sb, he does a decent job, he always tries to go forward, but obviously he has his limitations)
Defence: 83 ---> 84 (for me this season he is way better than kaladze, but not so much for owing a 86 for example.....so 85 should also be fine)
Balance: 84 ---> 85 (he is not a "muscle player" but most of the time he uses his bb to stop the strikers)
Short Pass Accuracy: 70 ---> 72
Short Pass Speed: 71 ---> 72
Long Pass Accuracy: 69 ---> 71
Header: 79 ---> 80
Jump: 79 ---> 80
*covering (he most of the time covers the flank left by zambrotta or the sb in that moment, he also works most of the time as 1st defender, this means that he is the cb that must go forward when a dmf is out of sight)
Rfuna wrote:Just lower Kaladze instead of increasing Bonera.
why not though. Does Kaladze deserve 85 for defence? Not just based on his perfomances this season but also last? All I'm saying lower Kaladzes Def. by 1pt, that way Bonera doesn't look so bad . I also disagree with the response number. I've mentioned it a few times before and as usual Gooner told me to piss off, or something to that effect He already has great speed for serie CB and marking*, combine that with a world class response stat... I'd like to see response lowered by 2/3 pts. I think that makes more sense.jmg721 wrote:Rfuna wrote:Just lower Kaladze instead of increasing Bonera.
That is a crazy concept....LOWERING??
zuo wrote:his Cons in my opinion could be 6. the rare times he played,he got decent performances.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests