
Moderators: Albo7, Akephalos, Major general Woof, KeyserSoze, Mod's
thor34 wrote:JUMP: 80/81/82. Digestible methionine and leap up to splice the header. From what I saw the half-length coat will easily to Angeleri.
thor34 wrote:JUMP: 80/81/82. Digestible methionine and leap up to splice the header. From what I saw the half-length coat will easily to Angeleri.
So you mean, he isnt agile, he cant dribble AND he isnt intelligent in his attacks? Then, what makes him the most dangerous full back of the whole league?
Fixer wrote:No wonder there's a 'penetration' stat, all of them players look like rapists
MocaBG wrote:Because you are a nerd and have no life.
KillaKlo wrote:Def: Surely he defends more by using his physical skills, but 65 is a crappy value in the ladder. That's worse than 80% of the rest of the league. His def is not bad at all in my eyes, he is nothing special but he is okay there. I don't see why he have to be under 67.
i share jurgens' point of view regarding ATT, he's similar Lichtsteiner (to a degree) both of them have extraordinary intelligence and off the ball movement, but they don't pose a threat and aren't directly dangerous, it's just movement and going with the flow and tempo and then finding a channel to exploit, it's the reason why KONAMI gave Licht such high TW (85) and good ATT for a SB (74). Now on the other hand, Marcelo (of RM) is far more dangerous and incisive as he attacks directly, gets involved in team play, plays occasional through balls and does much more what a winger or a forward would do, and IMO both Lich and Piszczek aren't comparable to him in terms of pure attacking intelligence.
Malakayi wrote:KillaKlo wrote:Def: Surely he defends more by using his physical skills, but 65 is a crappy value in the ladder. That's worse than 80% of the rest of the league. His def is not bad at all in my eyes, he is nothing special but he is okay there. I don't see why he have to be under 67.
In my book there is a need to widen the range of how many points in ATT or DEF make a good / bad SB. Currently green values in ATT / DEF are considered world class, even higher numbers are very uncommon (excluding hybrids like *CB/SB, *SM/SB etc.). On the other hand, as you said, a 65 in DEF as well as in ATT would be a crappy number in most top-leagues' ladder. What? I think it's very strange that the range between world-class and bad as crap should be just about 10 points.
As for DEF, i feel that we in particular are far to generous with that stat on full-backs, Piszczek is miles from a good defender and far away from a decent defender, i'd call his defensive ability (tackling, positioning, ability to shut channels) poor. He's constantly exposed with his adventurous forward runs and is a liability when trying to defend as a unit, his lack of defensive ability is rarely exposed though in BvB as they play possession football and mostly have the ball at their feet so the occasional blunder is fast forgotten. i'd settle on a 60.
Fixer wrote:No wonder there's a 'penetration' stat, all of them players look like rapists
MocaBG wrote:Because you are a nerd and have no life.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest