Viyut wrote:He's been our worst player by a fair margin and the weakest link of the team, ruining what should be a decent back 4 in the paper, that response value is at least 5, maybe 10 points above what he really deserves (also imo 79 is a world class value for a SB), same goes for his defense, which should be mid 50's.
I'd like to update he, but I wanted you to better explain your suggestions and numbers.
In statistics, he had good numbers in anticipations and stolen ball and in 2017, so I would like to understand how he would be so bad defensively.
Of the few things I've seen from him and considering the statistics, I do not think that response needs to fall so much. Let's say he's "aggressive" defensively?
I think, as you say, it can be bad. In the tactical or decision-making sense ... It could be, in the case, good physically, being faster and stronger and with smaller values of def and tw and slightly in the response, what about?