
EXPLANATIONS (outdated):
- Spoiler: show
CLASSIC SET(S): 2005-2006 & 2009-2010
- Spoiler: show
Original set by Bitz with some tweaks.
Moderators: Fixer, brazilianpesfan, Korinov, JuLiTo, Xyder, Mod's






fillerup wrote:i think he needs d-line*, because he leads barca and spanish backline


jmg721 wrote:I think Red had him at 95 def



Alcohomicide wrote:Is Puyol really as good in defence as Vidic and Carvalho!?? I would lower his def to 87-86, because this makes him one of the best CB's in the world. ...Which he isn't.



Alcohomicide wrote:Is Puyol really as good in defence as Vidic and Carvalho!?? I would lower his def to 87-86, because this makes him one of the best CB's in the world. ...Which he isn't.



Vandeach wrote:I think it is laughable that Red rated Puyol at 95 for defence, if so then surely Nesta must have a 97 or 98 on his option file! Puyol is a world class defender, but in positioning he is not. He has great reactions(which could probably go down by 1), pace and strength which make him a world class defender, I don't see how his positioning is this much better than Gallas, who relies purely on it perhaps an 87 defence for Puyol?


Alcohomicide wrote:I think 88 would be the max. I think his other classy attributes inflate peoples perception of his positioning, though.


PMC wrote:regarding the positioning argument... one has to consider that Puyol has alot more ground to cover than Vidic and that can affect one's positioning... Vidic is taking care of the space as Fergie orders him to and no one can penetrate this where as Puyol covers half the pitch because of Barca's attacking style... it will obviously mean that Puyol will be more likely to be caught off guard. Picture Vidic in Barca's team and he'd suffer alot more positionally as well

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest