Cesc Fàbregas

Moderators: Jez, BigStu, vinnie, Mod's

Cesc Fàbregas

Postby PES Stats Database » 2008 Dec 09, 10:54

Image

Spoiler: show
CLASSIC SET(S): 2003-2005 & 2009-2010 & 2011-2012


Last edited by vinnie on 2014 Aug 30, 18:57, edited 14 times in total.
Reason: updated picture
User avatar
PES Stats Database
 
Posts: 9897
Joined: 2008 Dec 09, 12:06
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 121 times

by »



 

Re: Cesc FABREGAS

Postby furymaker » 2012 Jun 11, 13:16

it's 2 point difference between Xavi and Cesc as I said before , Cesc can play in an advanced offensive role unlike Xavi , but Xavi makes up for it even more with his vision .
And Iniesta imo should be ahead of Xavi because he is more direct player , more aggressive in attacking role , take for an example spain-italy match , Iniesta was far more dangerous than Xavi , passing wise or dribbling/attacking wise , but he's not on Xavi's level in terms of vision , don't know if I explained you good enough what I mean :D

furymaker
 
Posts: 906
Joined: 2011 Aug 23, 01:23
Has thanked: 68 times
Been thanked: 96 times

Re: Cesc FABREGAS

Postby midnight » 2012 Jun 11, 13:25

Simple Xavi was a CMF and Iniesta was SS thats why he was more dangerous. Ans please that was offtopic.

Fixer - Fri Aug 02, 12:19 am
I'm gay
Fixer - Fri Aug 02, 12:19 am
See Shiterable? There's nothing to be ashamed of

Image
User avatar
midnight
 
Posts: 2050
Joined: 2012 Mar 06, 13:48
Has thanked: 301 times
Been thanked: 118 times

Re: Cesc FABREGAS

Postby furymaker » 2012 Jun 11, 13:28

so you're saying when Iniesta is playing in Barca as CMF/AMF he is not more dangerous/direct towards the goal than Xavi ?

furymaker
 
Posts: 906
Joined: 2011 Aug 23, 01:23
Has thanked: 68 times
Been thanked: 96 times

Re: Cesc FABREGAS

Postby jurgens » 2012 Jun 11, 13:31

And Iniesta imo should be ahead of Xavi because he is more direct player , more aggressive in attacking role , take for an example spain-italy match , Iniesta was far more dangerous than Xavi , passing wise or dribbling/attacking wise


The fact that hes more agressive, or direct is not a reason for higher attack. And I don't know what game you were watching, but xavi was much more dangerous with his passing.. he was as usual the best player on the pitch for spain, and he created the most chances.. what did iniestas passing creating?

The only area he ever beats xavi is in o offensive dribbling, as that his style.. not xavis.

The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge.

LeMisérable wrote:im not mad, why should I be mad just because of you, your nothing, 1 in 7 billion, i mean dude
User avatar
jurgens
 
Posts: 8360
Joined: 2009 Jul 19, 15:33
Has thanked: 856 times
Been thanked: 551 times

Re: Cesc FABREGAS

Postby furymaker » 2012 Jun 11, 13:34

Cesc's goal , it was started by Iniesta ? He passed to Silva and split up defenders , but nevermind , I find Iniesta more comfortable in attack than Xavi .

and you're dead wrong if you think Xavi was the best player on the pitch last game , It was Iniesta and De Rossi/Pirlo in Italy .

furymaker
 
Posts: 906
Joined: 2011 Aug 23, 01:23
Has thanked: 68 times
Been thanked: 96 times

Re: Cesc FABREGAS

Postby jurgens » 2012 Jun 11, 13:51

furymaker wrote:
and you're dead wrong if you think Xavi was the best player on the pitch last game , It was Iniesta and De Rossi/Pirlo in Italy .


you don't see what xavi does as it's not as spectacular? He created several goal scoring chances.

Can't be that wrong as http://www.whoscored.com/Matches/566045 ... pain-Italy seems to agree with me. 7 key passing in a single match, iniesta 1.

The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge.

LeMisérable wrote:im not mad, why should I be mad just because of you, your nothing, 1 in 7 billion, i mean dude
User avatar
jurgens
 
Posts: 8360
Joined: 2009 Jul 19, 15:33
Has thanked: 856 times
Been thanked: 551 times

Re: Cesc FABREGAS

Postby furymaker » 2012 Jun 11, 14:10

and then again , there is that CMF/SS argument again , but hey , Xavi is always spectacular , I love his game , but I think Iniesta was bit more dangerous with all running and attacking , but maybe I'm wrong , both had great games on their levels , it's matter of taste what people like more , more direct way or smooth control with amazing passes .
Iniesta every time he received ball created danger but pass he received was from Xavi , so then again , I really don't know :D

furymaker
 
Posts: 906
Joined: 2011 Aug 23, 01:23
Has thanked: 68 times
Been thanked: 96 times

Re: Cesc FABREGAS

Postby CHarper » 2012 Jun 11, 15:19

you think will be the successor of Xavi?
I think it is still far. not have consistency in his game :(

"No soy el mejor del mundo, pero creo que no hay nadie mejor que yo"
Jose Mourinho
User avatar
CHarper
 
Posts: 1586
Joined: 2011 Dec 11, 15:11
Has thanked: 107 times
Been thanked: 97 times

Re: Cesc FABREGAS

Postby furymaker » 2012 Jun 11, 18:34

Maybe he can , he's just too young to predict anything , Xavi was getting to his best at age 26 , so , you never know
I still rather put my money on Thiago , that guy has huge potential

furymaker
 
Posts: 906
Joined: 2011 Aug 23, 01:23
Has thanked: 68 times
Been thanked: 96 times

Re: Cesc FABREGAS

Postby Alex » 2012 Jun 12, 02:36

I agree that Iniesta shouldn't have higher att then Xavi. Andres has superb technique and dribling, but Xavi is more efficient then him. Also Xavi's vision is above Iniesta's.

Alex
 
Posts: 140
Joined: 2012 Jan 02, 11:57
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 10 times

Re: Cesc FABREGAS

Postby jurgens » 2012 Jun 17, 09:22

Tried to give him some form of update based on the suggestions, it's really unfocused though in whats actually agreed upon. I guess something a long these lines. Better than what we had anyways. I'd like to go even lower with attack, he doesn't compare with xavi/silva/iniesta.

The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge.

LeMisérable wrote:im not mad, why should I be mad just because of you, your nothing, 1 in 7 billion, i mean dude
User avatar
jurgens
 
Posts: 8360
Joined: 2009 Jul 19, 15:33
Has thanked: 856 times
Been thanked: 551 times

Re: Cesc FABREGAS

Postby zuo » 2012 Jul 02, 16:38

been saying this since barca milan matches..... imo cesc is just faster than this......
for me proved this even yesterday vs italy.......

Saving Private Adrian

Image
User avatar
zuo
 
Posts: 3333
Joined: 2009 Jan 19, 10:34
Location: North Italy
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 17 times

Re: Cesc FABREGAS

Postby vinnie » 2012 Jul 02, 19:21

i don't see it zuo. 78 TS at most, 77 seems just right.

If you don't put effort into your post, i won't put effort in my response.
User avatar
vinnie
 
Posts: 3643
Joined: 2012 Apr 06, 03:11
Location: ♛      
Has thanked: 384 times
Been thanked: 570 times

Re: Cesc FABREGAS

Postby furymaker » 2012 Jul 02, 19:33

he simply needs some more time to adjust perfectly to barca system , even playing as false 9 he was great , a lot of movement , passing , running behind the defense , just good overall performance by him on this EURO .
About TS he is faster than 77 , just I wouldn't give it to him because he doesn't show it often , remember the goal by Sanchez vs Leverkusen when they both started running at same time with same amount of length to reach the ball ? They were almost same speed , Alexis had shorter and more strides than him , yet , he didn't outran him more than half the meter . But that one situation doesn't guarantee him he'll get higher value than this one , he can be faster , just chooses not to show it , or it's not needed most of the times .
btw. what about TW ? Don't you think he was far more active in spain's attacks than 84 value would suggest ? He's not as lazy as that .

furymaker
 
Posts: 906
Joined: 2011 Aug 23, 01:23
Has thanked: 68 times
Been thanked: 96 times

Re: Cesc FABREGAS

Postby midnight » 2012 Sep 08, 23:40

what about his SPA ? since Iniesta and Messi sit on 94/95 and Silva having an upgrade too (since everybody's claiming it)so why not upgrading him too ?

Last edited by midnight on 2012 Sep 08, 23:49, edited 2 times in total.
Fixer - Fri Aug 02, 12:19 am
I'm gay
Fixer - Fri Aug 02, 12:19 am
See Shiterable? There's nothing to be ashamed of

Image
User avatar
midnight
 
Posts: 2050
Joined: 2012 Mar 06, 13:48
Has thanked: 301 times
Been thanked: 118 times

Re: Cesc FABREGAS

Postby jurgens » 2012 Sep 08, 23:40

93/94

The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge.

LeMisérable wrote:im not mad, why should I be mad just because of you, your nothing, 1 in 7 billion, i mean dude
User avatar
jurgens
 
Posts: 8360
Joined: 2009 Jul 19, 15:33
Has thanked: 856 times
Been thanked: 551 times

Re: Cesc FABREGAS

Postby midnight » 2012 Sep 11, 15:34

I'd say that he can easily be on par with iniesta , he did some worldclass passes last year , eventhough some people consider him as a better short passer than iniesta. stills my thoughts.

Fixer - Fri Aug 02, 12:19 am
I'm gay
Fixer - Fri Aug 02, 12:19 am
See Shiterable? There's nothing to be ashamed of

Image
User avatar
midnight
 
Posts: 2050
Joined: 2012 Mar 06, 13:48
Has thanked: 301 times
Been thanked: 118 times

Re: Cesc FABREGAS

Postby Yazid » 2012 Sep 11, 19:49

93.

Yazid
 
Posts: 876
Joined: 2011 Jan 16, 23:34
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 56 times

Re: Cesc FABREGAS

Postby ballmer » 2012 Sep 11, 20:09

Should his attack be only 2 points lower than Xavi/only 3 lower than Iniesta. I'm not sure if he's higher than Thiago even, or am I mistaken?

User avatar
ballmer
 
Posts: 827
Joined: 2010 Sep 02, 11:11
Has thanked: 19 times
Been thanked: 32 times

Re: Cesc FABREGAS

Postby Korinov » 2012 Sep 11, 21:36

Well, if lowering ATT will make him look "out of place" in the field as he tends to do IRL, then I would be ok with it. Not sure about SPA... 92/93 IMO.

Image Korinov la Komadreja
Spoiler: show
jurgens wrote:korinov clearly jinxed atletico. jealous of their succes he struck with kind words laced with hispanic voodoo.
User avatar
Korinov
 
Posts: 4011
Joined: 2011 Aug 31, 20:50
Location: Weasel store
Has thanked: 134 times
Been thanked: 346 times

PreviousNext

Return to Chelsea FC

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest