Radamel Falcao

Moderators: Welbeck19, Jez, Da InvIncIblEs, vinnie, Phil, Vranny, BigStu, Mod's

User avatar
PES Stats Database
Posts: 11782
Joined: 2008 Dec 09, 12:06

Radamel Falcao

Postby PES Stats Database » 2008 Dec 12, 22:09

Image
User avatar
Diego
Posts: 2328
Joined: 2011 Jul 16, 16:54

Re: Radamel FALCAO

Postby Diego » 2012 Jan 23, 19:43

he failed an descisive one on Copa America too :P
bam!
User avatar
Fixer
Posts: 9680
Joined: 2010 May 05, 18:43
Location: Avilés, Spain

Re: Radamel FALCAO

Postby Fixer » 2012 Jan 23, 19:45

Well his placement on penalties Isn't that great I mean, they are easily stoppable If the keeper goes to the right place. Players like Ronaldo who are awesome can just score It even If the keeper guesses It, but Falcao does not really risk at all.
kunmariano wrote:
Ajacied_Breda1 wrote:Why don't you just bugger off for a bit, kunmariano. I've got better things to do then read your biased tripe.

ey friend learns to write, DO NOT UNDERSTAND ANYTHING YOU !!!!... who believes you got a problem here?

Image
User avatar
Basilio
Posts: 2886
Joined: 2010 Nov 07, 12:39
Location: Underworld
Contact:

Re: Radamel FALCAO

Postby Basilio » 2012 Jan 23, 19:46

if we are to rate him with different standart, that of SA, shouldnt he sit a lot higher ? The guy couldnt stop scoring goals even when his team was shit.

How about higher TS and DA as mentioned before, he is fast to me
Descansa en paz Chucho
VUKDS
Posts: 1636
Joined: 2011 Aug 25, 14:30

Re: Radamel FALCAO

Postby VUKDS » 2012 Jan 23, 20:06

I don't know,he scored about 7 goals from penalties in this season. ;)
https://instagram.com/p/42WHwQTT2J/
User avatar
Fixer
Posts: 9680
Joined: 2010 May 05, 18:43
Location: Avilés, Spain

Re: Radamel FALCAO

Postby Fixer » 2012 Jan 23, 20:09

Ok Im updating DA and BB. Not sure on TS, he could get caught up but he's not easy to get past at all, he uses his body well in those cases.

As for SA I agree with a raise, even though his goals do not display It that often as they come from other abilities of him, I find him a pretty well composed placer after all.
kunmariano wrote:
Ajacied_Breda1 wrote:Why don't you just bugger off for a bit, kunmariano. I've got better things to do then read your biased tripe.

ey friend learns to write, DO NOT UNDERSTAND ANYTHING YOU !!!!... who believes you got a problem here?

Image
Mr. Evans
Posts: 2814
Joined: 2010 Nov 03, 10:58

Re: Radamel FALCAO

Postby Mr. Evans » 2012 Jan 23, 21:36

His TS is fine, he's 81 max imo (closer to a 80 than a 82 if you ask me).
Thoughts about higher ATT and Header? He's definitely a orange value if you ask me. Excellent positioning and movement, intelligent, constantly a huge threat and highly effective. And his Header should be amongst the very best if you ask me, he's just superb. And it's annoying when you compare others to him as a lot of players are under him in this aspect but it causes for values in the 87-89 range to be so crowded.. Both could use a two point boost imo.
thor34 wrote:JUMP: 80/81/82. Digestible methionine and leap up to splice the header. From what I saw the half-length coat will easily to Angeleri.
Kerry
Posts: 2287
Joined: 2011 May 06, 11:07

Re: Radamel FALCAO

Postby Kerry » 2012 Jan 23, 21:56

Agree with Mr. Evans. Still don't know why his HEA was decreased. ATT 90/91 and HEA 94 IMO, he's just THAT good.
mracho wrote: Well, then he/she was an idiom with a T at the end.


Farés L'arrogante Image
User avatar
Fixer
Posts: 9680
Joined: 2010 May 05, 18:43
Location: Avilés, Spain

Re: Radamel FALCAO

Postby Fixer » 2012 Jan 23, 22:18

Yeah I think so too. His heading skills are probably the best at this moment In the world or at least in the top 3 (Dont want to talk too loud)
kunmariano wrote:
Ajacied_Breda1 wrote:Why don't you just bugger off for a bit, kunmariano. I've got better things to do then read your biased tripe.

ey friend learns to write, DO NOT UNDERSTAND ANYTHING YOU !!!!... who believes you got a problem here?

Image
User avatar
Diego
Posts: 2328
Joined: 2011 Jul 16, 16:54

Re: Radamel FALCAO

Postby Diego » 2012 Jan 23, 22:21

yeah, I'd say is something like.
Falcao>Pazzini>CR7(?)
bam!
Mr. Evans
Posts: 2814
Joined: 2010 Nov 03, 10:58

Re: Radamel FALCAO

Postby Mr. Evans » 2012 Jan 23, 22:28

More like Cahill=Falcao>Klose>Pazzini (of the known players that is).
thor34 wrote:JUMP: 80/81/82. Digestible methionine and leap up to splice the header. From what I saw the half-length coat will easily to Angeleri.
User avatar
Fixer
Posts: 9680
Joined: 2010 May 05, 18:43
Location: Avilés, Spain

Re: Radamel FALCAO

Postby Fixer » 2012 Jan 23, 22:30

Can't tell on Cahill It's been a while and I automatically supposed he reduced his level of threat on headers for some reason. Is he on 95 atm? Could give Falcao a 93 or a 94. Decide It and I update everything.
kunmariano wrote:
Ajacied_Breda1 wrote:Why don't you just bugger off for a bit, kunmariano. I've got better things to do then read your biased tripe.

ey friend learns to write, DO NOT UNDERSTAND ANYTHING YOU !!!!... who believes you got a problem here?

Image
Mr. Evans
Posts: 2814
Joined: 2010 Nov 03, 10:58

Re: Radamel FALCAO

Postby Mr. Evans » 2012 Jan 23, 22:33

Cahill was probably like a 97 in his prime but like a 93/94(?) now. Anyway, I'm fine with either 93 or 94.
thor34 wrote:JUMP: 80/81/82. Digestible methionine and leap up to splice the header. From what I saw the half-length coat will easily to Angeleri.
User avatar
Fixer
Posts: 9680
Joined: 2010 May 05, 18:43
Location: Avilés, Spain

Re: Radamel FALCAO

Postby Fixer » 2012 Jan 23, 22:35

Given him a global yet partial update.
kunmariano wrote:
Ajacied_Breda1 wrote:Why don't you just bugger off for a bit, kunmariano. I've got better things to do then read your biased tripe.

ey friend learns to write, DO NOT UNDERSTAND ANYTHING YOU !!!!... who believes you got a problem here?

Image
perica1983
Posts: 16
Joined: 2010 Dec 05, 12:05

Re: Radamel FALCAO

Postby perica1983 » 2012 Feb 17, 18:01

I think he nedd to have goal poacher card because his scored gols like that.Last night game against Lacio,he scored two times like a poacher...
User avatar
Los Muchachos
Posts: 390
Joined: 2012 Mar 07, 16:58

Re: Radamel FALCAO

Postby Los Muchachos » 2012 Mar 12, 21:56

What no Playing Style Card
For Me I think ADD CARDS
1. FOX IN THE BOX
2. GOAL POACHER
Every man takes the limits of his own field of vision for the limits of the world
User avatar
stjuart
Posts: 130
Joined: 2011 Jun 15, 09:34

Re: Radamel FALCAO

Postby stjuart » 2012 Mar 13, 08:11

He has stronger shoot. 79 at least.
User avatar
Fixer
Posts: 9680
Joined: 2010 May 05, 18:43
Location: Avilés, Spain

Re: Radamel FALCAO

Postby Fixer » 2012 Mar 13, 12:41

No, he doesn't.
kunmariano wrote:
Ajacied_Breda1 wrote:Why don't you just bugger off for a bit, kunmariano. I've got better things to do then read your biased tripe.

ey friend learns to write, DO NOT UNDERSTAND ANYTHING YOU !!!!... who believes you got a problem here?

Image
Mr. Evans
Posts: 2814
Joined: 2010 Nov 03, 10:58

Re: Radamel FALCAO

Postby Mr. Evans » 2012 Mar 13, 20:29

White SP!
thor34 wrote:JUMP: 80/81/82. Digestible methionine and leap up to splice the header. From what I saw the half-length coat will easily to Angeleri.
User avatar
Fixer
Posts: 9680
Joined: 2010 May 05, 18:43
Location: Avilés, Spain

Re: Radamel FALCAO

Postby Fixer » 2012 Mar 13, 20:35

Not sure on white, but definitelly not higher than this. Btw I gotta say that The Blue Devil gave him some interesting values I'd like to check out on his thread. The set does not differ a lot but made some tweaks I like.
kunmariano wrote:
Ajacied_Breda1 wrote:Why don't you just bugger off for a bit, kunmariano. I've got better things to do then read your biased tripe.

ey friend learns to write, DO NOT UNDERSTAND ANYTHING YOU !!!!... who believes you got a problem here?

Image
User avatar
Fiddy
Posts: 2295
Joined: 2010 Jan 08, 15:44

Re: Radamel FALCAO

Postby Fiddy » 2012 Mar 13, 20:42

Yeah, SP is fine as it is, can't go lower, not higher.
About TBD's set, i find it interesting too not sure os some values tho, for instence BB and shooting stats, but could defenitly agree with GP ;)

Return to “Chelsea FC”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests