CLASSIC SET(S): 2011-2013 & 2009-2011 & 2004-2006
- Spoiler: show
Cruel wrote:Isn't 95 DA too high for him? Or, to put it other way: 6pts more than D. Silva, 8 points more than Di Maria? Not questioning Andres abilities here, but the differnce seems just too high...
mracho wrote: Well, then he/she was an idiom with a T at the end.
ballmer wrote:A few months ago jurgens and (I think) Mr Evans, were discussing a combo of SPA increase with a TW decrease. Since then I think his SPA was raised to 93. But what does everyone think of TW 90? Personally, I can't see that he moves for the team moreso than Iniesta (92) and if the possibility that lower TW correlates to a greater tendency to make the killer pass, as opposed to building play more patiently/make safer passes, then a lower value than Iniesta is surely needed. In principle I certainly think a SPA>TW ratio ought to be the case. Does anyone else have any opinion on this idea?
Mr. Evans wrote:I like that idea ballmer. Can't add anything more as you've already explained why the change could be made.
His SPA could be brought down to a 92 again btw. We raised it to help him play the killer ball more and improve his vision a bit but it doesn't really work. And I don't like him sitting just one point behind prime Dinho. But a 92 would put him too close to Iniesta.. but he should come down a point imo. I think we could create a nice ladder with Iniesta 90/Cesc 92/Dinho 94. Thoughts?
jurgens wrote:That sounds pretty good to me. I'd like to see iniesta at a 90, really the gap between him and messi is very small.
cale wrote:it's up to the mods to say what's good or bad
thor34 wrote:JUMP: 80/81/82. Digestible methionine and leap up to splice the header. From what I saw the half-length coat will easily to Angeleri.
Users browsing this forum: giovinco33 and 3 guests