Never understood why he had 88, wouldn't rate him over 86 tbh (DS on a 95). He was fast but he wasn't a 'sprinter'. I also don't think he was this explosive. A 94 puts him one point behind what I rate Krasic and on the level of Pato a year/few years back who I rated a 94/95. I think a 92 fits him better.
His AGI could possibly go up though. He was so freakishly agile for a man his size. The likes of Messi and Sanchez are so much smaller than him so putting him over and/or on par with them would only seem wrong on paper but there would still be a big difference between them in game.
Agree with you on his SPA jurgens, he was phenomal passer. And yeah RES is too much (83?), the same with STA (I'd put him on 84).
His SP is too high. Yes Dinho could wack them sometimes but his shots are just so powerful on consistent basis in game, mainly because of his very high ST. I brought him down to a 85 and he works much better with it imo. I also think his SA could possibly go down a point. Not sure though so I'd like to hear people's thoughts on it.
And I think his ATT could go up by a point or two with TW coming down.. what do you guys think? And isn't his DEF generous?
And does did he play AM in that period?
About his 2008-2010 set, it should be changed to 2009/2010. He wasn't good in his first season at Milan.
Btw congrats on becoming a mod jurgens