Facundo Roncaglia

Moderators: čale, Epsi, Mod's

User avatar
PES Stats Database
Posts: 10417
Joined: 2008 Dec 09, 12:06

Facundo Roncaglia

Postby PES Stats Database » 2009 May 25, 21:55

Image

User avatar
xeneize
Posts: 5247
Joined: 2010 Oct 17, 16:51

Re: Facundo RONCAGLIA

Postby xeneize » 2011 Jul 17, 22:53

sincerellyi like it more :lol:
THANKS FOR EVERYTHING, THERE WILL BE NOT ANOTHER LIKE YOU
Image
User avatar
Vickingo
Posts: 13683
Joined: 2010 Jun 09, 02:18
Location: Argentina

Re: Facundo RONCAGLIA

Postby Vickingo » 2011 Jul 17, 23:12

Are you sure that his TS isn't in yellow zone?
User avatar
xeneize
Posts: 5247
Joined: 2010 Oct 17, 16:51

Re: Facundo RONCAGLIA

Postby xeneize » 2011 Jul 17, 23:39

for now, with TS:79 and ACC: 81 could work fine to me...but 80 isn't a bad idea for his TS, to me is the same here
you decide (decidan uds)
THANKS FOR EVERYTHING, THERE WILL BE NOT ANOTHER LIKE YOU
Image
User avatar
julgui
Posts: 2757
Joined: 2010 Feb 03, 16:29

Re: Facundo RONCAGLIA

Postby julgui » 2011 Jul 17, 23:41

Yes, totally.
Señor Ascenso | Mr. Lower Leagues
User avatar
Xyder
Posts: 4010
Joined: 2008 Dec 10, 01:54
Location: Barcelona, Spain

Re: Facundo RONCAGLIA

Postby Xyder » 2011 Jul 17, 23:44

When he played for Espanyol he didn't shown any great TS. If he hasn't developed himself a lot, for me, 79 for TS is fine.
Image
Image
User avatar
Vickingo
Posts: 13683
Joined: 2010 Jun 09, 02:18
Location: Argentina

Re: Facundo RONCAGLIA

Postby Vickingo » 2011 Jul 17, 23:52

Nice those values :) Any extra suggestion?
User avatar
xeneize
Posts: 5247
Joined: 2010 Oct 17, 16:51

Re: Facundo RONCAGLIA

Postby xeneize » 2011 Jul 17, 23:58

+1 in HEA maybe, he's good in the aerial game and isn0t so tall, to me with 83 could work better
you think his TEC is ok at 74?

and for the future, no for now maybe 1 more in MENT
THANKS FOR EVERYTHING, THERE WILL BE NOT ANOTHER LIKE YOU
Image
User avatar
Vickingo
Posts: 13683
Joined: 2010 Jun 09, 02:18
Location: Argentina

Re: Facundo RONCAGLIA

Postby Vickingo » 2011 Jul 18, 00:09

I think that more than +1 in HEAD, he needs +1 in Jump. He wins aerial balls more for his capacity of jump (1,79 m it's very low for a CB) than for his capacity of head which isn't good. MENT is good in 81 IMO, is a high value for him, but it's fine the current. In tech I like 75 (+1)
User avatar
xeneize
Posts: 5247
Joined: 2010 Oct 17, 16:51

Re: Facundo RONCAGLIA

Postby xeneize » 2011 Jul 18, 00:20

i don't know what pass with me today :lol: :?

i try to say +1 in JUMP (i explain all and put HEA in th eplace of JUMP)
THANKS FOR EVERYTHING, THERE WILL BE NOT ANOTHER LIKE YOU
Image
User avatar
Vickingo
Posts: 13683
Joined: 2010 Jun 09, 02:18
Location: Argentina

Re: Facundo RONCAGLIA

Postby Vickingo » 2011 Jul 18, 00:27

Yes, I agree with that (I said it first, and I agree with myself jajaja)
User avatar
xeneize
Posts: 5247
Joined: 2010 Oct 17, 16:51

Re: Facundo RONCAGLIA

Postby xeneize » 2011 Jul 18, 00:32

:lol:

nothing more from my part
THANKS FOR EVERYTHING, THERE WILL BE NOT ANOTHER LIKE YOU
Image
User avatar
jorgecavs
Posts: 4490
Joined: 2009 Apr 03, 19:12
Location: Argentina
Contact:

Re: Facundo RONCAGLIA

Postby jorgecavs » 2011 Jul 18, 17:20

For me in any way the ACC is greater than TS.
Maybe:
TS: 79
ACC: 78-79


vickingo_73 wrote:I think that more than +1 in HEAD, he needs +1 in Jump. He wins aerial balls more for his capacity of jump (1,79 m it's very low for a CB) than for his capacity of head which isn't good. MENT is good in 81 IMO, is a high value for him, but it's fine the current. In tech I like 75 (+1)

Agree with JUMP in 83 and TECH in 75, but no HEADER.
And I prefer DEF 78.
ATTACK / DEFENCE AWARENESS: DEF
User avatar
xeneize
Posts: 5247
Joined: 2010 Oct 17, 16:51

Re: Facundo RONCAGLIA

Postby xeneize » 2011 Jul 18, 18:54

HEAD was my mistake, teh increase is for his JUMP ;)
i'm disagree with those values for his speed
i prefer the last values who we discuss
THANKS FOR EVERYTHING, THERE WILL BE NOT ANOTHER LIKE YOU
Image
User avatar
Vickingo
Posts: 13683
Joined: 2010 Jun 09, 02:18
Location: Argentina

Re: Facundo RONCAGLIA

Postby Vickingo » 2011 Jul 18, 19:01

Yes, 79-81 will be the best. I agree with 83 in JUMP.
User avatar
xeneize
Posts: 5247
Joined: 2010 Oct 17, 16:51

Re: Facundo RONCAGLIA

Postby xeneize » 2011 Jul 20, 19:17

nothing more?
THANKS FOR EVERYTHING, THERE WILL BE NOT ANOTHER LIKE YOU
Image
User avatar
Vickingo
Posts: 13683
Joined: 2010 Jun 09, 02:18
Location: Argentina

Re: Facundo RONCAGLIA

Postby Vickingo » 2011 Jul 20, 19:29

May be his DS is a bit low, don't you think? He played a lot as SB and his dribble speed wasn't so crap.
User avatar
xeneize
Posts: 5247
Joined: 2010 Oct 17, 16:51

Re: Facundo RONCAGLIA

Postby xeneize » 2011 Jul 20, 19:31

mm i'm not sure, maybe a small raise will be good but i'm not sure

what you suggest?
THANKS FOR EVERYTHING, THERE WILL BE NOT ANOTHER LIKE YOU
Image
User avatar
Vickingo
Posts: 13683
Joined: 2010 Jun 09, 02:18
Location: Argentina

Re: Facundo RONCAGLIA

Postby Vickingo » 2011 Jul 20, 19:38

78 sounds fine.
User avatar
xeneize
Posts: 5247
Joined: 2010 Oct 17, 16:51

Re: Facundo RONCAGLIA

Postby xeneize » 2011 Jul 20, 19:43

so:


SIDE: B

TS: 79
ACC: 80/81
DS: 78
SPS: 75?
JUMP: 83
TEC: 75


ATT/DEF: DEF
THANKS FOR EVERYTHING, THERE WILL BE NOT ANOTHER LIKE YOU
Image
User avatar
Vickingo
Posts: 13683
Joined: 2010 Jun 09, 02:18
Location: Argentina

Re: Facundo RONCAGLIA

Postby Vickingo » 2011 Jul 20, 19:49

Done, also I increased 2 points his ATT and decreased 1 point his BB (isn't at the same level or better than Galeano or Velazquez)

Return to “Genoa CFC”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests