Philippe Mexès

[PES Stats Database]

[Rfuna]

updated attack, response, DA, DS, SA, SP, ST and mentality.

[Vandeach]

Surely his curling could be raised, I've seen him get a fair amount of curl on his passes, 74 maybe?

[Ken]

Surely his curling could be raised, I've seen him get a fair amount of curl on his passes, 74 maybe?

Sry for off-topic but hey Vandeach are you doing a Curling revolution ?

[Vandeach]

Surely his curling could be raised, I've seen him get a fair amount of curl on his passes, 74 maybe?

Sry for off-topic but hey Vandeach are you doing a Curling revolution ?

Umm... Call it that if you like but low 60's in game for curling is stupidly unrealistic, passes go dead straight. Also Mexes does get very good curl on his passes, so he deserves an increase regardless.

[Rfuna]

Surely his curling could be raised, I've seen him get a fair amount of curl on his passes, 74 maybe?

are 100% certain about curling @ 74? I think 70 just to be on the safe side.

[Rfuna]

did anyone else catch his 50 yard dash through the Juve midfield in the 1st half? Certainly he deserves higher TS and DS, IMO TS @ 82 and DS @ 77. Also looked stronger than Amauri on the ball and when applying pressure, so considering he's also lighter I think BB can go up, perhaps BB @ 90

[Alex_10]

Also looked stronger than Amauri on the ball and when applying pressure, so considering he's also lighter I think BB can go up, perhaps BB @ 90

eheh, this is what Ulises referes in the ATT/DEF discussion.. imo is not pure power but finesse in defending, mastery and not muscles.. but whole this discussion will never come to something usefull..

anyway we can't reach a final value for his TS, how many time has been updated?! imo 80 - 81 will be enough..
agree about DS

[N3KR0]

His BB have to go up, hes stronger than this IMO,i think 89/90 fits him well.

[Phil]

I also agree that BB could be 89 and TS could be in the low yellows. Plus do you think TW could go up 1 or 2 points also ? I'd say he deserves to be on the same level as Kroldrup or Zapata (both on 81).

[Rfuna]

updated defence, BB, response, TS, ACC, DS, curling and TW. Removed sliding* and covering*. Added index cards.

[Paddy]

did anyone else catch his 50 yard dash through the Juve midfield in the 1st half? Certainly he deserves higher TS and DS, IMO TS @ 82 and DS @ 77. Also looked stronger than Amauri on the ball and when applying pressure, so considering he's also lighter I think BB can go up, perhaps BB @ 90

I honestly don't think he's anywhere near a value of 82 for TS. He's lost so much pace in the past few years.

[Josh]

I'd agree with that, the current value is ok.

[Manne]

With these stats he' have about the same DEF and RES as Lucio and Chielini who may have been the best defenders in Serie A last year together with Samuel. Mexes have in my opinion always been overated. He's talented for sure and posseses many great qualities, but have always been too inconsitent to deserve the numbers he currently sits at.

I'm thinking defence 84 at most and Res 84 at most. If you summarize his most important defence stats i think Burdisso should be over him as a total, but who knows maybe Ranieri is crazy and don't understand football or have some personal grief against him for selecting Burdisso before him.

If a player is out of favor and another one with inferior stats is selected before him in the starting lineup, then this is something that must be looked at. Exception should only be if it's for personal reason Mexes wasn't the first choice before Burdisso.

[FernandoA13]

Do posts get removed?!

[Ace]

Yes, because you posted a new full set without ask permission to anyone, and an user asked you to explain all your values but you didn't do it. Please respect rules, and try to understand better stats (come on, you wrote Defence 89 for Mexes...), you were lucky if nobody already warned you

[FernandoA13]

Yes, because you posted a new full set without ask permission to anyone, and an user asked you to explain all your values but you didn't do it. Please respect rules, and try to understand better stats (come on, you wrote Defence 89 for Mexes...), you were lucky if nobody already warned you

I didn't know i had to ask somebody permission. i am new at thi. sorry i got ''outta of line''
i just thought it was normal to post my opinion. And i did explain it.

As in my defence, i think it's a bit weak of you to post my most arguable stat posted. What about his agility only being 77? pff come on are you joking? understand stats..please man.. so if you think somebody deserves a better stat and somebody else thinks otherwise, the other guy is what? dumb?

I just cleary thought Mexes was underrated thats all mate.

Ps: I think Mexes deserves better Agility like atleast 80, because he quite athletic, and how does somebody like Zaccardo have a higher stat? or julio baptista or maxi lopez..

[Ace]

Don't worry, you are new so you have time to learn Post a new set of stats it's forbidden because if everyone post his own set this website will become crazy, that's why everyone must post single changes with an explaination. For example a message like (it's just an example) "increase his to Stamina to 86" is not tolerated, the ideal message is something like "Stamina can be increase to 86, he can be on the level of [names of players already on 86]", of course the comparison must be sensed and not a cheap excuse for ask an increase (damn, it happens). The dream of every moderator are messages like this or this (note the huge explaination), but as I said it's only a dream nowadays. Talking about Mexes, if you are interested in suggest some values, try to say some values but with a sensed explaination, words are better than numbers to explain, after all this is also a forum of football knowledge not a brothel of random numbers. I personally can't help you so mucn because I don't follow Roma every week but we have a moderator that is a Roma supporter and he surely is the best person to help here. I hope this message can help you.

[FernandoA13]

Don't worry, you are new so you have time to learn Post a new set of stats it's forbidden because if everyone post his own set this website will become crazy, that's why everyone must post single changes with an explaination. For example a message like (it's just an example) "increase his to Stamina to 86" is not tolerated, the ideal message is something like "Stamina can be increase to 86, he can be on the level of [names of players already on 86]", of course the comparison must be sensed and not a cheap excuse for ask an increase (damn, it happens). The dream of every moderator are messages like this or this (note the huge explaination), but as I said it's only a dream nowadays. Talking about Mexes, if you are interested in suggest some values, try to say some values but with a sensed explaination, words are better than numbers to explain, after all this is also a forum of football knowledge not a brothel of random numbers. I personally can't help you so mucn because I don't follow Roma every week but we have a moderator that is a Roma supporter and he surely is the best person to help here. I hope this message can help you.

It helped thnx

[Al-bulldozer]

He controls the ball very well so I suggest to raise his tech and da . He is one of the best defenders with controlling the ball . He is more agile and can respond faster than 86 . He weighs 82 and has 89 for bodybalance which is not good for a defender like him . I see him as the best defender at Roma .
My suggestions
tech +2
da+1
response +1
bodybalance +1
That's what I think and I'm waiting for your replaying .

ــــــــــــــــــــ

[Martina]

Must be updated, is the best defender in Serie A, you must update the balance and control the ball