BANEGA, Éver - Valencia CF
MESSI, Lionel - FC Barcelona
ROJO, Marcos - Spartak Moscow
ROMERO, Sergio - UC Sampdoria
LUGANO, Diego - Paris Saint-Germain FC
MARADONA, Diego Armando | 1994-1997 - Boca Juniors
"Despiertenme... Cuando pase el reggaeton."
Good point. I noticed that too. I just noted that in the original thread aswell.vickingo_73 wrote:Am I the only who watches this guy slow as hell? In no way I'd rate him in TS in a yellow number.
Xyder wrote:*Playmaking and no Talisman?
Xyder wrote:Don't you think he drives the ball a lot to deserve 1-touch play? (yeah he can make it fine, but if he does it more often, argentinean and valence football will grow up in speed and will become more unpredictable)
julgui wrote:juan92 wrote:hey julgui do you ggot any set of maradona on he's boca's days??
In 1981-1982 or 1995-1997?
Agree with you, but completely not
Fantasista wrote:Why did you rate him that low in da and tech? A mean that's obvious he wasn't as good back then as in 86' but I can't believe he lost that much of it. They are very specific skills you barely lose with time(esp tech). Regardless if we rate prime Maradona at 98 or 99 da he couldn't gone to that bad. On the other hand my knowledge about him comes form youtube videos mostly so I can be horribly wrong. No matter what I'd like to hear your explanation if you can be that gentle
xeneize wrote:i have some questions ...
about his SPA, obviously you watch more of him compared with me, but his passes were so good (very similar to riquelme's passes) also in that time? compared with 86's diego, have -2 in SPA but have 4 points more in SPS and +2 in TW, with this set he can do great passes (like with that set of teh 86)... anyway, like i said, you watched more of him
and his aggresivines, with 81 in AGG plus ATT/DEF: S/OFF is not too much? is only a question (i don't test it already, could be a bit high but i'm not sure anyway, maybe the C. num 10 do him more static) he always was really aggresive, but i have that doubtalso IMO in that time he was not so good in RES, IMO was a more vague player
and BALhe always was a good player to cover the ball (with a short body but with much power), i know he was worse compared with 86 era, but with the lose of speed he learn or try to cover the ball better IMO sometimes, are you sure 4 point less is fine?
this set is the most expected for me but I hope also that of the 81 ... good work
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest