Alexis Danelón

[gotaa]

[Vickingo]

Nice player! I can suggest an increase of 2 or 3 points in STA, he runs the whole match and for this guy 81 is very poor, also an increase in his DA

[julgui]

Nice? Whenever I found this player sucks.
Are those kinds of players you love or hate.

Update: STA.

[julgui]

http://www.bocaunidos.org.ar/index.php? ... l&Itemid=3

Transfer to Boca Unidos

[Christiancito]

Primary position: SB.

[gotaa]

Probably the man of the match against Instituto, showed a great Stamina and speed, always with a lot of commitment and aggression. His DS was amazing at some moments and along with a more than decent DA managed to bring problems to Instituto defenders. Awful SA, despite his goal, missed at least 2 one-on-one opportunities

[lucardax5d]

I think he need a new set for complety.

[gotaa]

And the suggestions? I know the set needs changes, but it would be better if you post what you think about him DURING THE SEASON instead of proposing changes to every player that is close to arrive Huracán, as you generally do I'll update as soon as I can, if you want to suggest something it will be taken into account if properly explained.

[lucardax5d]

http://www.clubahuracan.com.ar/2012/07/ ... e-rivoira/

[gotaa]

Made the pending update on him. Increased ATT/STA/TS/ACC/DA/DS/AGG and decreased DEF/RESP/SA/FKA/TECH/MENT/TW. I didn't touch passing as I keep doubts about them, specially long ones.

[Vickingo]

Good update, just as a side question...are you sure about that TW? Always seemed me a good teamworker player in terms of movement and be available...tbh I couldn't watch Huracan's matches but in last season or lately I remember some good stuff taking into account that, probably I'm wrong.

[gotaa]

It's to make him more lack of cordination in defense and to leave his position to more advanced ones along the side. Anyways, it's true what you say about him being available and moving much, specially when plays as SM. I'll keep an eye, but according to my view and as he usually plays SB, I thought it was correct.

[gotaa]

Lucas what do you think about this set? I think his att could be one or 2 points lower, he's a bit dumb and he appears in attack more because of will and aggression rather than intelligence. I also think he could have better TS/ACC and worse (white) DA/TECH, he hardly keeps the ball near his feet whilst dribbling, he's more of a speed-punt-and-run dribbler. Was it my impression or he played some matches in a kind of CM position?

[lucardax5d]

Lucas what do you think about this set? I think his att could be one or 2 points lower, he's a bit dumb and he appears in attack more because of will and aggression rather than intelligence. I also think he could have better TS/ACC and worse (white) DA/TECH, he hardly keeps the ball near his feet whilst dribbling, he's more of a speed-punt-and-run dribbler. Was it my impression or he played some matches in a kind of CM position?

Totally agree with you. There are two points that decrease in ATT, because several times it shows a little silly to define or determine the course of the plays (his attack only based on aggressiveness, not intelligence). About the TS & ACC, perhaps it could increase your TS 1 point more, but ACC is already well in 84.. is fast but not that much. His DA and TECH undoubtedly must be white, has trouble stopping the ball, and also to handle it when it is on your feet.. suggest 73 in both skills.

Yes, has played a "double five" on several occasions, as the CM that more moves and not defends both.
Furthermore you can decrease your RES one point more, to 71.

[gotaa]

Good! Done then