Philippe Mexès

Moderators: crisfar, čale, Epsi, zuo, Mod's

Philippe Mexès

Postby PES Stats Database » 2008 Dec 11, 00:10

Image


Last edited by Dino on 2008 Dec 19, 15:32, edited 3 times in total.
User avatar
PES Stats Database
 
Posts: 10023
Joined: 2008 Dec 09, 12:06
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 123 times

by »



 

Re: Philippe MEXÈS

Postby čale » 2012 Mar 22, 10:37

gotta say that i agree with the suggestions apart from a raise in AGI, he's waaay to sluggish to even deserve a green value IMO, the way he turns his body is even painful to watch, it's like he's skiing those hard and unbalanced/uncontrolled moves he does on 90 degree turns are just horrid, and when he's wrong footed by a player it's really terrifying...the only thing which helps him is that he's balanced that out with his decent ball control and movements when it's in his possession...

Fixer wrote:No wonder there's a 'penetration' stat, all of them players look like rapists

MocaBG wrote:Because you are a nerd and have no life.
User avatar
čale
 
Posts: 4730
Joined: 2010 Jun 13, 12:20
Location: The Mango Tree
Has thanked: 405 times
Been thanked: 193 times

Re: Philippe MEXÈS

Postby crisfar » 2012 Mar 22, 14:15

I agree, ok with the other suggestions but no for agility I was even thinking to go under greens for him, cale explained perfectly why...

User avatar
crisfar
 
Posts: 1179
Joined: 2008 Dec 20, 20:51
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Philippe MEXÈS

Postby FernandoA13 » 2012 Mar 22, 18:16

Okay fair enough my suggestion was mainly based on when he dribbles, its descent for a CB.

Sporting Clube de Portugal meu amor / Working on new sets and updating Liga Sagres
User avatar
FernandoA13
 
Posts: 2833
Joined: 2011 Feb 14, 16:50
Has thanked: 64 times
Been thanked: 40 times

Re: Philippe MEXÈS

Postby zuo » 2012 Mar 22, 22:42

i know there's a kind of lowering "agi standard" ...
for his size imo mexes isnt super-unagile. Chiellini is lesser agile and composed even being 1 cm shorter and 6 kgs lighter.

Saving Private Adrian

Image
User avatar
zuo
 
Posts: 3333
Joined: 2009 Jan 19, 10:34
Location: North Italy
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 17 times

Re: Philippe MEXÈS

Postby crisfar » 2012 Apr 03, 19:42

OMG! He was destroyed by Messi on a long run ...now here they only have 4 pts diffrence but he lost around 2-3 mts in 20 mts ao I think there must be 8-10 points so either we have to raise Messi ts or lower him...

User avatar
crisfar
 
Posts: 1179
Joined: 2008 Dec 20, 20:51
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Philippe MEXÈS

Postby čale » 2012 Apr 03, 20:59

not destroyed, OBLITERATED! he's painfully slow and has always been, i really can't see a justified reason why he's rated that high...personally i've always had him tops at TS 75 and that was two or three seasons ago...nowadays i've got him on 73/70 which is more than enough...

now to comment on his match;
he was terrible IMO, showed that he has little tactical intelligence and often makes unnecessary moves which constantly complicate his life and bring the team into problems...he's constantly being dragged out of his position by various players completely losing and kind of positional sense and just continues chasing the player until he takes the ball away or fouls him leaving gapping holes at the back, and also, when there is no Nesta to coordinate him and his movements he gets completely lost, he had two oncoming players both running 5 meters wide from him from both sides and he decided that it would be best if he stands in the middle of them instead of choosing a player to mark and lessening the oncoming danger. those were just glaring errors this match, but there were more, but they were less obvious and tactically related...

oh and, i'm bringing the former discussion about his DA, AGI and LPA back to the spotlight. Opinions?

Fixer wrote:No wonder there's a 'penetration' stat, all of them players look like rapists

MocaBG wrote:Because you are a nerd and have no life.
User avatar
čale
 
Posts: 4730
Joined: 2010 Jun 13, 12:20
Location: The Mango Tree
Has thanked: 405 times
Been thanked: 193 times

Re: Philippe MEXÈS

Postby crisfar » 2012 Apr 03, 21:32

So values that come now in my mind can be TS 73/74, Acc 73, for the reasons you expressed cale I would lower def just -1 and TW around 74-75, also Ment seems a bit generous (why I left it like that in last update?) maybe can be 79-80, also header can go a bit down...then condition to 5...other suggestions?

User avatar
crisfar
 
Posts: 1179
Joined: 2008 Dec 20, 20:51
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Philippe MEXÈS

Postby čale » 2012 Apr 03, 21:36

i'd rather decrease TW to a 74/75 with 79/80 MENT as it would make him lose his spot more often in the backline. and i believe that ACC has to be under his TS, as for condition, i agree on a 5.

Fixer wrote:No wonder there's a 'penetration' stat, all of them players look like rapists

MocaBG wrote:Because you are a nerd and have no life.
User avatar
čale
 
Posts: 4730
Joined: 2010 Jun 13, 12:20
Location: The Mango Tree
Has thanked: 405 times
Been thanked: 193 times

Re: Philippe MEXÈS

Postby 7oodam » 2012 Apr 03, 21:40

I think you guys are a bit harsh on him, after all he's not the only guy who was outpaced by messi

User avatar
7oodam
 
Posts: 388
Joined: 2011 Jun 17, 18:09
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: Philippe MEXÈS

Postby čale » 2012 Apr 03, 21:42

this has nothing to do with him being outpaced, this is about him being f-ing slow, he never even deserved these speed stats...

Fixer wrote:No wonder there's a 'penetration' stat, all of them players look like rapists

MocaBG wrote:Because you are a nerd and have no life.
User avatar
čale
 
Posts: 4730
Joined: 2010 Jun 13, 12:20
Location: The Mango Tree
Has thanked: 405 times
Been thanked: 193 times

Re: Philippe MEXÈS

Postby jurgens » 2012 Apr 05, 01:07

his technical skills are clearly much higher than this, hes very good for a cb in this regard

The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge.

LeMisérable wrote:im not mad, why should I be mad just because of you, your nothing, 1 in 7 billion, i mean dude
User avatar
jurgens
 
Posts: 8400
Joined: 2009 Jul 19, 15:33
Has thanked: 887 times
Been thanked: 558 times

Re: Philippe MEXÈS

Postby Joak » 2012 Apr 05, 01:35

jurgens wrote:his technical skills are clearly much higher than this, hes very good for a cb in this regard


Yep, agree too, very technical for a cb and with a good distribution from the back...

User avatar
Joak
 
Posts: 274
Joined: 2011 Jan 21, 23:06
Location: Santiago, Chile
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Philippe MEXÈS

Postby čale » 2012 Apr 05, 09:39

So, i've updated his DEF, TS, ACC, AGI, TW & MENT.

I'd like to reach now a general consensus on his DA and S/LPA.

Fixer wrote:No wonder there's a 'penetration' stat, all of them players look like rapists

MocaBG wrote:Because you are a nerd and have no life.
User avatar
čale
 
Posts: 4730
Joined: 2010 Jun 13, 12:20
Location: The Mango Tree
Has thanked: 405 times
Been thanked: 193 times

Re: Philippe MEXÈS

Postby 7oodam » 2012 May 15, 14:51

I think you still haven't updated his techncal skills. I have him on 78 DA/TEC and 82 LPA 80 LPS,
He delivered another amazing long pass to cassano against Novara

User avatar
7oodam
 
Posts: 388
Joined: 2011 Jun 17, 18:09
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: Philippe MEXÈS

Postby čale » 2012 May 15, 16:12

i know, and that's why i said:

I'd like to reach now a general consensus on his DA and S/LPA.


i'd like to hear more opinions on those stats, that's all.

Fixer wrote:No wonder there's a 'penetration' stat, all of them players look like rapists

MocaBG wrote:Because you are a nerd and have no life.
User avatar
čale
 
Posts: 4730
Joined: 2010 Jun 13, 12:20
Location: The Mango Tree
Has thanked: 405 times
Been thanked: 193 times

Re: Philippe MEXÈS

Postby 7oodam » 2012 May 15, 16:13

Ok, that's why I gave you my opinion ;)

User avatar
7oodam
 
Posts: 388
Joined: 2011 Jun 17, 18:09
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: Philippe MEXÈS

Postby MrEskola » 2012 Jun 25, 08:49

If anything, he's very inconsistent performer. Condition 5 is a must.

I do agree that he has quite good technique and DA for a centre-back's standard. Only his agility, or his unagility lets him down. He really has to have at least DA and TECH 78, SPA 77, both LP stats on 80.

Can somebody explain why he has only 80 STA? I think he has to have at least 85.

MrEskola
 
Posts: 1041
Joined: 2011 Sep 07, 20:23
Location: Tampere, Finland
Has thanked: 21 times
Been thanked: 14 times

Re: Philippe MEXÈS

Postby coly » 2012 Jun 26, 08:45

If anything, he's very inconsistent performer. Condition 5 is a must.

I do agree that he has quite good technique and DA for a centre-back's standard. Only his agility, or his unagility lets him down. He really has to have at least DA and TECH 78, SPA 77, both LP stats on 80.

Can somebody explain why he has only 80 STA? I think he has to have at least 85.


agree with everything except STA. a very few CBs deserve that value imo, especially with the new standard.... i'm fine with current 80, or 81 maximum

Be careful of the cat. Don't say you have the cat in the sack when you don't have the cat in the sack. (Giovanni Trapattoni)
User avatar
coly
 
Posts: 142
Joined: 2011 Jun 26, 15:24
Location: italy, world
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 6 times

Re: Philippe MEXÈS

Postby Adrien » 2012 Jun 26, 12:47

Does he deserves this high response? I'm not 100% sure but in all games of NT I saw, he seems like a very slow CB wich prefer waiting back of the defense to intercept balls. I don't remember him getting out of the defensive line. For example, when I play PES with France NT Mexès always get out to intercept ball because of this high response, may be I'm wrong but I don't feel him as this type of defense.

They have eyes but cannot see; they have ears, but cannot hear; they have tongues, but cannot speak. They are like cattle.
User avatar
Adrien
 
Posts: 3450
Joined: 2011 May 16, 19:27
Location: France
Has thanked: 386 times
Been thanked: 317 times

Re: Philippe MEXÈS

Postby MrEskola » 2012 Jun 26, 15:38

coly wrote:
If anything, he's very inconsistent performer. Condition 5 is a must.

I do agree that he has quite good technique and DA for a centre-back's standard. Only his agility, or his unagility lets him down. He really has to have at least DA and TECH 78, SPA 77, both LP stats on 80.

Can somebody explain why he has only 80 STA? I think he has to have at least 85.


agree with everything except STA. a very few CBs deserve that value imo, especially with the new standard.... i'm fine with current 80, or 81 maximum

Ah okay, I'm not always alert about the new standards...

MrEskola
 
Posts: 1041
Joined: 2011 Sep 07, 20:23
Location: Tampere, Finland
Has thanked: 21 times
Been thanked: 14 times

PreviousNext

Return to AC Milan

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest