Andrea Ranocchia

[PES Stats Database]

VIDEOS:

Spoiler: show

[demoneye]

Good stats, but since Ranocchia playing for Inter (Samuel injuried) Inter has suffered a lot , for his lack of responsiveness and no-marking.
I suggest defence 79 and response 77-78.

[The Special One]

Cant downgrade him just becouse the last performances for Inter. The entire defence has been terrible under Leonardo.

[FoxBatS]

after watching him since his transfer.. I have even more respect for Samuel..

What a differenc Samuel makes

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pb6wQTfs ... re=related

Amazing¡¡¡

[Dino]

Guy has been playing with a knee injury for some time now...give the dude a break, people.

[FoxBatS]

[demoneye]

NO! There is no player like Samuel! xD lol

[Rfuna]

his new response and defense numbers were never clearly explained. was a rash decision IMO. Yes he's been horrible defensively but it has been a difficult for months for him, injuries, new CB partners, new tactical set-up, difficult to assimilate under these circumstances.

[jurgens]

His passing speeds need tweaks. I can't rember them clearly off the top of my head, but he was defintly an okay passer, sometimes playing a bad pass, but usually okay. Really can't rember anything of the top of my head on the specific of his passes, but something like an spa of 72/73 and and a sps of 74/75 would be more fitting. Just can't rember his long passes at all for suggestions, but I'm sure some can.

[jurgens]

Making the exact same mistakes vs galatasary regardless of who he was paired to. This guy is quite a laughable player at times, good be the downfall of inter once more this season.

[Rfuna]

horrible in 1v1s because the mids don't offer enough protection so he's often having to step out of defence to close down a player running at him where he often fails. response should be lower than def IMO. original values were okay, no?

Making the exact same mistakes vs galatasary regardless of who he was paired to.

you can't ignore the fact that he looks competent with the national team.

[demoneye]

agility could be higher than 77. It could be 80 I think.
Defence 82 is too much for him. I saw many matches of him (on tv and at San Siro) and I think he has many gaps. I suggest 78-79 for defence.

[Capone]

No, I don't think, that he deserves a 80 in agility, maybe 78-79. Also a lower value than 80 for defense is laughable, because Ranocchia can read a game very well. Sometimes he makes positioning errors, but this is due to inexperience. 82 is great.

[Diego]

Quite a decent passer, he can give some pace to his pace too, though nothing of other world tbh. The difference between him and Samuel is quite notorious with current stats, which in the reality aint really.

However, going for the other side of this his positioning is shit, can find him out of position and doing the same bs of last year, he seem to havent improve, and he is hardly a yellow on this, an constant flaw about at least with Inter, where whenever you can see him he is at times completely lost.

His reactions arent great at all too, never truly concentrated, not really an 83 imo, would like to suggest just a point lower by now still giving this so long doubt benefit, as I know he came less than a year ago and suffered injuries, managers were shit, etc. but the truth is that he have displayed no more than this.

with this being sayed I would like to suggest something around these values:
Spa 71
Sps 74/73
Def 78, even 77 wouldnt be crazy.
Res 82 by now

[ravenkeeper]

He's pretty erratic in his passing though, despite having the quality and depth.

I mean he's not consistent enough, sometimes he doesn't wieght them in enough and causes a blunder(something you can expect from him in this way or another atleast once a game often causing a clear cut chance at goal)

I think his responce is a bit too high toom and agree with positioning being bad.


In general, if he can concentrate for full 90 minutes and be consistent not screwing up this kid can be world class - but seems like he has those 5 minute of screwups every game putting his team in danger... hopefully it's just the age thing though.

[Diego]

@ravenkeeper yeah, but I really find an 68 a bit harsh, he aint THAT terrible passing, still quite far from the like of Chivu, pretty obvious, but I rather see him on an Average to bad value than current one. He give some decent pace to his passes, and they arent really "bouncy". We got a really decent passer with him imo, though as you pointed out he tends to cause blunder, you made me think about Tw being a bit generous, not really the one that tend to spread the play, and as his positioning his communication is a bit shitty, maybe Tw @ a green figure and that really raise could be a quite fair change, right?

gotta mention I find BB at least a point generous, looking at his height he reallly dont impose himself on physical challenge, He prefers to go to ground (sliding) in order to get a ball rather than outmusculating someone.

btw not a big deal, but as for shooting, dont remember him being soo shitty as an 61/62 would represent.

EDIT: At least he showed some nice performance today, A bloody red arrow I guess though my thoughts still remains

[CHarper]

Ranocchia has more balance thiago silva? .. Are you sure? and more than Nesta? do not believe this at that level as Terry,. .. should evaluate is young and has a long future, but that point is very high, and it is not, a 83/84 would be better. is more appropriate to their weight,

[Diego]

you mean height*? as I said BB NEED to come down, so I am agree

[CHarper]

you mean height*? as I said BB NEED to come down, so I am agree

in fact this very high Ranocchia your BB, someone please verify the Serie A thanks! BB 83/84

[Epsi]

updated defence, BB, SPA and SPS

[CHarper]

An adjustment DEF (82), RESP (79), TW (75)
and other adjustments suggested in the thread, are appropriate for someone with the youth of, Rannochia, a little inexperienced
http://pesstatsdatabase.com/viewtopic.php?p=365994#p365994