
Moderators: Epsi, zuo, čale, crisfar, Mod's


jmg721 wrote:Can you tell me if there is a harder working CF in the Serie A. If he had more talent & size he would be a world beater.

I don't want to be too generous with his passing stats, because he is a CF and not as good of a passer as Zarate for example. But he does have nice passes, and even some nice touch LP this season that have resulted in assists. Currently his passing stats look pretty similar to Zarate's. Plus Pellissier has better TW. If I were to suggest anything....maybe 72 LPA?Short Pass Accuracy: 74
Short Pass Speed: 73
Long Pass Acc.: 70
Long Pass Speed: 71

I honestly am a fan of players, and teams with players I enjoy to watch. As I am routing for Chievo to play in the Serie A next season...I would definitely currently say my support is like this: Fiorentina, Torino, Lazio, Chievo, Atalanta, Catania, Palermo, Cagliari, Sampdoria, Napoli.rfuna wrote:Jason, why do I get the impression you're a soon-to-be-chievo fan.
So let me get this straight....You basically need to be playing for a team that plays deep into Europe or Cup matches in order to be given a 7. The fact that he has played almost every min for his team over the past 5 seasons, and this season he's played more minutes than all of those guys who have 7's. My main crusade on this site is to make sure that players on smaller clubs are getting a fair shake. And to me it seems harsh to not give him a 7.Oreillo wrote:50+ games 4500 minutes in one season that they should be a standard apart from all others and an 8 in Conditioning.
40 games approxiametly 3600 minutes is the mark I see for Conditioning 7

Oreillo wrote:The fact that he has played almost every min for his team over the past 5 seasons, and this season he's played more minutes than all of those guys who have 7's.
I think you'll find that Gila's played more games anyway.jmg721 wrote:Stamina: 85(on par with Gilardino)
Well I actually wrote that I could Agree for a Conditioning 7 for Pellisier if he manages another 36 game season in regard to him being played quite consistently non stop for so many seasons, but this should be an uncommon exception. If you were questioning in general, then yes I believe that only players who prove themselves physically being able to handle the rigours of so many mathces should be rated in the upper echelons of the Conditioning values. Similar to how if Giovinco was wowing us all with wonderful touches and dribbling in Serie B could/would he get rated at high values despite the lower level of opposition as he might be able to replicate Maradona like domination in Serie A? no. Same with the Conditioning if a players is given the oppurtunity through whatever competitions to showcase long term endurance and performs to what was asked then he has demostrated the ability, though it might be true some great athletic players could handel as many games as Rio Ferdinand, but we cannot assume, same as we cannot assume A Maradona like Giovinco in Serie B would be like Diego in Serie A. Poor analogy but that is the best I got on the fly.jmg721 wrote:So let me get this straight....You basically need to be playing for a team that plays deep into Europe or Cup matches in order to be given a 7. The fact that he has played almost every min for his team over the past 5 seasons, and this season he's played more minutes than all of those guys who have 7's. My main crusade on this site is to make sure that players on smaller clubs are getting a fair shake. And to me it seems harsh to not give him a 7.
No seeing as he is a A INJ type player who rarely is sidelined I could see making a slight exception for Sergio due to his consistent appearances of league matches over several years. The Stamina I think would be better laddered at the 87 mark in view of some other forward, who I personally think both Gilardino and Ibrahimovic go pedistrian often, while Pellissier is more full of running, thus ladder wis it is a more fair representation. Unfortunately I am not privy to seeing him every wekk thus I am unsure of his fitness after a match is he like Molinaor a bit knackered after too much effort?jmg721 wrote:Okay, so looking through this basically we are saying his Conditioning has to stay at a 6 untill he can get some European Appearences.....but we will look at raising his Stamina. Were you formally suggesting an 87 Oreillo? I got the feeling you felt 85 was greatly underrating him.
Agree!Oriello wrote: Well I actually wrote that I could Agree for a Conditioning 7 for Pellisier if he manages another 36 game season
Here you go. He's used a sub in quite a few games. He's not quite a 30+ man like other serie a strikersOriello wrote: Those 8 more games would be ideal as it would align him well in the minutes categories, but as I stated a minor exception may be made due to the multiple years of appearcanes, but do you by any chance have the figures on him being subbed in the other seasons?
Oriello wrote: EDIT: just checked Maicons page http://www.inter.it/aas/squadra/player4 ... AG=2006/07, Minute wise 06/07 3874, 07/08 3488, 08/09 3772 - suprisingly he has not reached Zanetti like levels yet of approachijng 4500 minutes, maybe if the totals for Brazil caps can be found during the seasons possible (and posted in his thread for the case) totals could be calculated assuming full 90 mins in thos matxches, but based on Inter appearances the 7 seems right.

Rfuna wrote:points dropped for Juve.... i'm so happy![]()

HitMan wrote:hat-trick masta, his speed is 83-84 from juve chievo match.. outran mellberg with no problem, and was on par with chiellini..
hat-trick masta, his speed is 83-84 from juve chievo match.. outran mellberg with no problem, and was on par with chiellini..
So will I Sergio... and so will MellbergSergio Pellissier wrote:I’ll remember this day for a very long time
Rfuna wrote::lol: Juve fans.HitMan wrote:hat-trick masta, his speed is 83-84 from juve chievo match.. outran mellberg with no problem, and was on par with chiellini..
weren't his speed stats higher than this Jasonmy a 1/2pt increase for each is in order => TS:84, ACC:82. And ST ought to be 84/85
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest