Anderson

Moderators: BigStu, vinnie, Jez, Mod's

Anderson

Postby PES Stats Database » 2008 Dec 09, 17:59

Image


Last edited by vinnie on 2014 Jan 30, 05:50, edited 4 times in total.
Reason: updated picture
User avatar
PES Stats Database
 
Posts: 9605
Joined: 2008 Dec 09, 12:06
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 110 times

by »



 

Re: ANDERSON

Postby choccy » 2008 Dec 30, 14:46

Ulises wrote:You can try to be more comprensive and think that we can't agree to a suggestion bassed on that you play on an old version. If you know that aggresion workd diffrent in the last version you should try to suit him how stats works actually. But anyway do you have any problem to rate it at 82?¿ Or we should wait until you buy the last version of PES?¿


How can I make suggestions for a version I haven't played? If my opinion isn't wanted here the mods are welcome to tell me to sod off. If you have any more problems about this, PM me. You won't get an answer, but at least the thread will be free of this "discussion".

Persona non grata
User avatar
choccy
 
Posts: 308
Joined: 2008 Dec 15, 13:37
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: ANDERSON

Postby RB7 » 2008 Dec 30, 15:44

IMO his technique is better than Nani's you could see it even in his Porto days.. I'd switch his with Nani TBH..

SPORTING CLUB PORTUGAL
User avatar
RB7
 
Posts: 1361
Joined: 2008 Dec 08, 19:54
Location: Portugal
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: ANDERSON

Postby Paddy » 2008 Dec 30, 15:45

nani's techniwue is overated, why not just move nani's down to 86 instead?

User avatar
Paddy
 
Posts: 8617
Joined: 2008 Dec 08, 20:01
Location: Dublin
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 32 times

Re: ANDERSON

Postby RB7 » 2008 Dec 30, 15:49

Paddy wrote:nani's techniwue is overated, why not just move nani's down to 86 instead?


88 is Simão's level and no way Nani is that good IMO.. while Anderson is.. but 86 might be harsh towards Nani too..

SPORTING CLUB PORTUGAL
User avatar
RB7
 
Posts: 1361
Joined: 2008 Dec 08, 19:54
Location: Portugal
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: ANDERSON

Postby Paddy » 2008 Dec 30, 15:51

really, I think 86 is okay for him.

User avatar
Paddy
 
Posts: 8617
Joined: 2008 Dec 08, 20:01
Location: Dublin
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 32 times

Re: ANDERSON

Postby RB7 » 2008 Dec 30, 16:01

Paddy wrote:really, I think 86 is okay for him.


That's your opinion, not everyone has to agree with it.

SPORTING CLUB PORTUGAL
User avatar
RB7
 
Posts: 1361
Joined: 2008 Dec 08, 19:54
Location: Portugal
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: ANDERSON

Postby quincy_huang » 2008 Dec 31, 03:14

i have been playing around with anderson(not on bed :lol: ,i mean in pes09)
and i would like to take back my agree for defence 69
as i truely feel this area is overrated
in game he perform differently to wht he did in real
in real, he chase player a lot with high pressure
which mentality 88 and BB 83 would do a great job
but is he good defence positioning?
as a CMF he is good, but not that gd
where he has 63 now
i think 65 suit his much better...

Last edited by quincy_huang on 2008 Dec 31, 04:01, edited 1 time in total.
quincy_huang
 
Posts: 197
Joined: 2008 Dec 12, 09:30
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: ANDERSON

Postby pedala robinho » 2008 Dec 31, 03:53

Quincy, I was thinking the same. I played and he looked a monster with that defence. Really agree 65 is enough.

pedala robinho
 
Posts: 1173
Joined: 2008 Dec 09, 22:50
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: ANDERSON

Postby Ulises » 2008 Dec 31, 04:13

Yes it's true. I signed him in RM and played RM vs RM and he outbalanced metzelder 2 times in a match!! how could it be?¿

But anyway i think his defensive positioning in real life is not bad, and also his atk/def balance will make him to be positioned upper and worse positioned. So i had the idea that we could probably do in other way; DEF: 66, Mentality 86; lowering his brave defense, and keeping in my opinon better balanced in atk/def. Or even DEF: 67, Mentality: 85.

What do you think about this?¿

Ulises
 

Re: ANDERSON

Postby quincy_huang » 2008 Dec 31, 13:03

Ulises wrote:Yes it's true. I signed him in RM and played RM vs RM and he outbalanced metzelder 2 times in a match!! how could it be?¿

But anyway i think his defensive positioning in real life is not bad, and also his atk/def balance will make him to be positioned upper and worse positioned. So i had the idea that we could probably do in other way; DEF: 66, Mentality 86; lowering his brave defense, and keeping in my opinon better balanced in atk/def. Or even DEF: 67, Mentality: 85.

What do you think about this?¿

actually i agree wht u wrote on RVP thread, u were right
apply it same way in here
i think slightly lower his aggression, defence at 65, mentality 88 might work more correctly?
becoz lower his mentality would make him less "hard working" which mean can be less likely to chase the ball

quincy_huang
 
Posts: 197
Joined: 2008 Dec 12, 09:30
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: ANDERSON

Postby TheTrueSeto » 2008 Dec 31, 13:05

I agree with 65 defence

TheTrueSeto
 
Posts: 335
Joined: 2008 Dec 14, 10:27
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: ANDERSON

Postby Ulises » 2008 Dec 31, 13:08

OK so we go with:

ATK: 75
DEF: 65
AGG: 82

Agrees: Thetrueseto, pedala robinho, quincy huang, ulises
Disagrees:

Ulises
 

Re: ANDERSON

Postby Paddy » 2008 Dec 31, 15:27

I'll agree if we add CMF*

User avatar
Paddy
 
Posts: 8617
Joined: 2008 Dec 08, 20:01
Location: Dublin
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 32 times

Re: ANDERSON

Postby Ulises » 2008 Dec 31, 17:12

quincy_huang wrote:actually i agree wht u wrote on RVP thread, u were right...


Post your agree there plz to count you as an agree ;)




Paddy wrote:I'll agree if we add CMF*


Yes of course needed, and delete SS, imo he should have: DMF, *CM, SMF, AMF. I add to the suggestions.


ATK: 75
DEF: 65
AGG: 82
Position: *CM, SMF, AMF

Agrees: Paddy, Thetrueseto, pedala robinho, quincy huang, ulises
Disagrees:

Last edited by Ulises on 2009 Jan 21, 14:16, edited 1 time in total.
Ulises
 

Re: ANDERSON

Postby Paddy » 2008 Dec 31, 18:16

I guess 5 is enough to update.

User avatar
Paddy
 
Posts: 8617
Joined: 2008 Dec 08, 20:01
Location: Dublin
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 32 times

Re: ANDERSON

Postby al_pacino » 2009 Jan 01, 09:37

i think his speed is overrated :!:

DeFrenZ wrote:LOL.

If you think that these "tricks" make the game "oh so f**ktastic", considering the animations are also pretty stiff, I think you don't want to play a "football" game :)
al_pacino
 
Posts: 115
Joined: 2008 Dec 13, 16:01
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: ANDERSON

Postby Paddy » 2009 Jan 01, 15:35

It is.

User avatar
Paddy
 
Posts: 8617
Joined: 2008 Dec 08, 20:01
Location: Dublin
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 32 times

Re: ANDERSON

Postby quincy_huang » 2009 Jan 01, 15:57

al_pacino wrote:i think his speed is overrated :!:

yes to me as well
but how much? i dont have any specific value yet
quite difficult to rate

quincy_huang
 
Posts: 197
Joined: 2008 Dec 12, 09:30
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: ANDERSON

Postby Paddy » 2009 Jan 01, 16:00

Top Speed: 83
Acceleration: 85
Dribble Speed: 84

are these okay?

User avatar
Paddy
 
Posts: 8617
Joined: 2008 Dec 08, 20:01
Location: Dublin
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 32 times

Re: ANDERSON

Postby pedala robinho » 2009 Jan 02, 01:18

TBH, I don't think he is THAT slow. I think TS: 84 is better and ACC: 86~87 is better. And for DS: 85, he really don't lose a lot of speed with the ball.

pedala robinho
 
Posts: 1173
Joined: 2008 Dec 09, 22:50
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 1 time

PreviousNext

Return to Manchester United FC

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests