vickingo_73 wrote:jorgecavs wrote:manoloxcr17 wrote:PD: A la mierda, es mejor que Papa, Cubero, Domínguez y Ortiz entonces.
Marking, Sure than Papa and Ortiz. They aren't Pique and Lucio xD jajaja.
manoloxcr17 wrote:Why you change you mind all the time? I think 75 is enough for him as he is SB.
jorgecavs wrote:He is having a good level, is playing as RB, and goes to attack very often, his play Any thoughts have changed 180 degrees.
- Spoiler: show
Vickingo wrote:Vs Quilmes. Wow really, the worst player of the team by far. He's so non-technical, really he mistrapped so easy balls many times. Also his DA sucks as well as his general passing. He's good at spend stamina and probably at aggression, but still imho isn't nothing special.
KeyserSoze wrote:Is Aw 1/3 a typo problem or was it on purpose?
Lumia wrote:i.ATT I noticed that Caceres wasn’t so retarded as first value suggest for ATT, I think that he should be at higher level and on the other hand his DEF value is high. In my opinion, both values should be switched but he has CB as secondary position and I don’t know how often he is used there and with my value he would be too bad.
Lumia wrote:ii.I recall higher AGG as well, for me he needs a yellow value (82) and specially he needs a higher ATT/DEF awareness, just taking Libertadores he should sit at 3/3.
Lumia wrote:iii.More than his defensive abilities I think he is good at responsiveness, making good coverings and reacting fast. Don’t suggesting a higher value just wanted to remark it.
Lumia wrote:iv.Considering a small boost on his DA ( 2) can be safe too. Overall he needs a review.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest