PMC wrote:Personally I just don't believe that he's that weak... he seemed physically stable to me at the very least and could warrant something like 78 for BB. His TW could also be raised a bit since he seemed to work well with the rest of the team and he does a good job in keeping the game going. What do you guys think?
heliophilous wrote:Regarding the balance: Ninkovic looks quite fragile player. He did not win power contests. It is better to overtake an opponent by choosing the correct position.
Passing, I think this is too much for Ninkovic. His pass lacked precision, speed and cunning.
Also, Ninkovic, as I said, is not a player in the defensive plan. Judge on one match with Germany - this is not entirely correct. I understand that the national team and club player can perform different functions, but at final - stats must be evaluated, taking into account all of his abilities.
PMC wrote:fair enough... I'll pay close attention to him in the next round
To compare him with Apostol is kind of unfair imo. Apostol is small, combative and extremely agile on top of it.
Dane94 wrote:Agree about Petkovic Well will you update his abilitis?
Dane94 wrote:Oh common?He is still so underrated...Koroman is a better passer than him?!:S
You know what to do i won't give you any sugestions.
Dane94 wrote:He won't come to CZV he said himself...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests