jurgens wrote:Not "Oh my god I worked so hard on this set, someone has a differnt opinion on something that needs to be changed... do whatever you want I gave up!" Seriously wtf.
thor34 wrote:JUMP: 80/81/82. Digestible methionine and leap up to splice the header. From what I saw the half-length coat will easily to Angeleri.
BigStu wrote:maybe I've misread but just giving a player all 50's caus no one can agree is pathetic
Mr. Evans wrote:What's all this hostility? Can't people just act civilized towards each other and simply discuss stats without anyone's feelings getting hurt? This is so stupid.
s-cobar wrote:honestly I´ve him on Att 78 in my OF, on a lower res - ment somewhere in the low 70s but it wouldn`t fit at all in here. also I´m definitely against ts over acc - but it`s a new trend on PSD to rate everyone with a higher ts than acc. I can`t understand why it`s so often that we create new trends - like in the past to rate every player with a great height on a high ts and low acc. still kill individualism, same like before just a trend where all are follow
“But I live life as I did when I was a kid, like a video game - there will always be another level to overcome.” Alessandro Del Piero ♥
Fixer wrote:Cause I'm kinda like Han Solo, always stroking my own "Wookie"...
MocaBG wrote:Because you are a nerd and have no life.
Steven Gerrard wrote:I think I am not exaggeration .
I think that you are unjustly players Arabs.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest