Thiago Motta

[PES Stats Database]

[zuo]

Injury Tolerance: B you people are joking this guy is injiury again for one mothe he shoul have C

last year got a decently year about inury tolerance....played 27 games...but for the amount of injuries he takes (and has taken) and the span of those,i think he could be a C

[Ace]

WTF he injured, I hope he will not start a bad series

Ron please add this video to first post

[aurandon]

He deserves a *Passing regarding his vision. Also, SPA/SPS should be marginally increased.

[Rfuna]

He deserves a *Passing regarding his vision. Also, SPA/SPS should be marginally increased.

I can agree to passing* but anything more than that is unwarranted. Tech could go up to 83 (or I could lower Stankovic, Eto'o and Cambiasso's tech by 1 pt). Also his registered position should be CMF.

[Ace]

surely his main position is CMF, and I would also remove the optional CB

about *Passing, it's ok for me

[zuo]

i disagree to *Passing. i don't put him in the category of passers like Cassano,Cossu,Kakà ecc...he is just great about help mantain possession......imo it's more a TW issue

[Capone]

I also disagree to *Passing.

[Rfuna]

i disagree to *Passing. i don't put him in the category of passers like Cassano,Cossu,Kakà ecc...he is just great about help mantain possession......imo it's more a TW issue

they have much better passing stats tho. I happy either way. Only stat that needs real updating is tech. He's certainly more comfortable on the ball than either Stankovic and Cambiasso. IMO tech @ 82-83. aside from that I'm pretty happy with these stats as they are

[zuo]

TEC ladder is a bit hard to read at the moment........i could agree to an 82,but surely people like Candreva,Dzemaili,Lodi and Mauri are more gifted than him.....and than Maicon too(who sits @83).

What really always makes me think is his DA/DS rating....i have to keep an eye on that,counting that he is really not fast at all.

[Capone]

No, Disagreed with technique update too. Motta isn't technical as strong as the players that zuo mentioned.

I think his technique value is 100% right.

[nico90]

I agree with CMF* and TEC 82. Disagree with passing 'cause IMO it's a TW issue;

[zuo]

imo,
if Motta has indeed a better touch than Cambiasso and Eto'o and Stankovic it would be proper lower the rest of them.it wouldnt be fair having some players rated so high only cause a 'team-laddering'....if i have to be honest,Inter squad in general never impressed me as general quality of first touches,and this is linkable to their real issue,the somehow lacking of technical playing....seeing the ladder:
Muntari at 81 TEC seems too high,Cambiasso too.....Stankovic im unsure either.
probably id ladder them as:

84 J.Zanetti safe value!
83/84 Eto'o
83 C.Chivu safe value!

82(tops) Maicon
81/82 T.Motta
81/82 Stankovic
80 Cambiasso
79 Muntari

[Rfuna]

imo,
if Motta has indeed a better touch than Cambiasso and Eto'o and Stankovic it would be proper lower the rest of them.it wouldnt be fair having some players rated so high only cause a 'team-laddering'....if i have to be honest,Inter squad in general never impressed me as general quality of first touches,and this is linkable to their real issue,the somehow lacking of technical playing....seeing the ladder:
Muntari at 81 TEC seems too high,Cambiasso too.....Stankovic im unsure either.
probably id ladder them as:

84 J.Zanetti safe value!
83/84 Eto'o
83 C.Chivu safe value!

82(tops) Maicon
81/82 T.Motta
81/82 Stankovic
80 Cambiasso
79 Muntari

i can't disagree with you Zuo. IMO Stanko, Cambiasso and Eto are not as sound technically as Motta, not by much mind.

[zuo]

nice to hear that from you.....right now im going out,we can discuss some values for all that players later....it's important to make right values for all players,sure,but when we come to BIG clubs it' moreso important cause the weaknesses are more difficult to find/admit. imo Tech skills,(not Technique alone) are in general the not great point of Inter,a well known 'phisical' team....opposite to Body skills,like Stamina,Body Balance,Speeds,Condition and so.........that's my view.

[Rfuna]

imo Tech skills,(not Technique alone) are in general the not great point of Inter,a well known 'phisical' team....opposite to Body skills,like Stamina,Body Balance,Speeds,Condition and so.........that's my view.

i'm sure every inter fan would agree with you, myself included.

[Rfuna]

So tech @ 81 possible 82. Also thinking of upping attack to 74 since be plays more like a box-to-box midfielder.

[Alex_10]

Also thinking of upping attack to 74 since be plays more like a box-to-box midfielder.

And what about swapping ATK and DEF, his tackling technique is pretty rough..

[Rfuna]

Also thinking of upping attack to 74 since be plays more like a box-to-box midfielder.

And what about swapping ATK and DEF, his tackling technique is pretty rough..

thats possible. although I'm somewhat cautious as he once fielded as a CB and DMF, but with mixed results.

Other updates I'm looking at:

agility @ 77 -->nothing excessive but he's somewhat elegant on the ball with his movements and turns. i think for a big lad it is quite a safe value
DS @ 78 --> decent runner on the ball. still quite slow though
tech @ 82
LPA @ 83 --> nice placement, although not much range with his long balls
LPS @ 81

remove middleshooting*-->he is getting less play time but when was the last time he had an effort on goal from distance?

[Rfuna]

updated registered position (to CMF), attack, defence, BB, agility, DA, DS, LPA, LPS, swerve. tech and aggression

[Dino]

IT should go back to C IMO.

He has always been an C player 'cept last season.