Ronaldinho | 2003-2006 | 2000-2002 | 2008-2010

[Brezza]

-2003/2006

Nickname: "Dinho" | *El Mago de Porto Alegre* | *O Rei* | "Ronnie"

Club: FC Barcelona



Growth type: Early/Lasting

******************************************************

-2001/2003

Nickname: "Dinho" | *El Mago de Porto Alegre* | *O Rei* | "Ronnie"

Club: Paris Saint-Germain



Growth type: Early/Lasting

******************************************************

-2008/2010

Nickname: "Dinho" | *El Mago de Porto Alegre* | *O Rei* | "Ronnie"



Club: AC Milan

[vinnie]

what's the point of questioning the point of proving a point? Trying to earn points? It's not besides the point to give pointers or point out traits. Not to point fingers, but you've missed the point.

[Pastor of Muppets]

But anyway any thoughts on my suggestions?

[Alex]

I suggest his TEC 98, cause he ain't a point higher then Cassano and Zidane.

[vinnie]

he's definitely higher then zidane. control wise he's arguably on the same level as Cassano.

[Alex]

Maybe he is higher, but definitely I don't know... But I think Diego should be the sole 99(even though in PES language Antonio is a 99 and also Ronaldinho), because he was in real life the best ever at technique(which is just not just first touch).

[vinnie]

i know, but you can't really show that in pes. control (first touch)=TEC in pes

[Alex]

So then Cassano moves to 99 also?

[vinnie]

that should be in cassano's thread no?

[Fantasista]

he's definitely higher then zidane. control wise he's arguably on the same level as Cassano.

Are you talking about technique?

[vinnie]

by technique i mean in pes terms (ball control, or first touch)

[Fantasista]

by technique i mean in pes terms (ball control, or first touch)

Well obviosult you were referring to skill in pes. I was asking because your statement that Ronaldinho was absolutely better than Zidane at trapping the ball literally blew my mind

[vinnie]

absolutely better at trapping by one point. The difference is minimal, but in my opinion Ronaldinho did have a better first touch then Zidane. What he did with that first touch, or second touch may not have had the same tint of genius compared to Zidane, but in terms of control i do believe he was superior.

[bitz]

I would go higher in BB for his 2003-2006 era. A 89 wouldn't seem out of place he really had the bulldozer effect back then, especially in the '05-'06 season.

[Fantasista]

I would go higher in BB for his 2003-2006 era. A 89 wouldn't seem out of place he really had the bulldozer effect back then, especially in the '05-'06 season.

He ain't a Riquleme for god sake!

[bitz]

I would go higher in BB for his 2003-2006 era. A 89 wouldn't seem out of place he really had the bulldozer effect back then, especially in the '05-'06 season.

He ain't a Riquleme for god sake!

He was strong in his own way and he was physically in his peak at that time, he could not be body-checked and when he played with his back to goal he could hold off almost anyone. I don't see how he is inferior to Riquelme.

[AlexDantas2009]

Technique: 99 it's too high, I think 96 or 97 would be more accurate. Not even Pelé has 99 technical.

[midnight]

uhm . . . u sure ?

. . .

[nianka97]

He was strong in his own way and he was physically in his peak at that time, he could not be body-checked and when he played with his back to goal he could hold off almost anyone. I don't see how he is inferior to Riquelme.

Spoiler: show

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xr731l_riquelme-keep_sport if anything riquelme is underrated

[Fantasista]

He was strong and that's why he has 86 bb however he should sit on 85 IMO which was the value before the update.
PS. Why in 2000-02 and 08-10 set he has higher curling than in the prime one?

[steith]

in my opinion
ds 95
sp 86