Nicolás Blandi

[jorgecavs]

[nachogr28]

Actually I'm asking for keep the same value in SA (no need more, he sucks defining)/SP and increase his ST/ATT/RESP/give Goal Poacher.

I don't think he sucks in SA. He's not that good, but he deserves a little more than 75

[Vickingo]

Actually I'm asking for keep the same value in SA (no need more, he sucks defining)/SP and increase his ST/ATT/RESP/give Goal Poacher.

I don't think he sucks in SA. He's not that good, but he deserves a little more than 75

Well about his lately history and his season in Boca, he missed a lot of "made goals" showing an awful placement. He relies more in his positioning and ST as case Castillejos or Piriz Alvez, being like a poacher and defining inside the box, near the small box. If he scores but before that he misses 4 goals in a good position, so why he should have more than just greens? That's not necessary, it'd be overrate him.

[nachogr28]

Actually I'm asking for keep the same value in SA (no need more, he sucks defining)/SP and increase his ST/ATT/RESP/give Goal Poacher.

I don't think he sucks in SA. He's not that good, but he deserves a little more than 75

Well about his lately history and his season in Boca, he missed a lot of "made goals" showing an awful placement. He relies more in his positioning and ST as case Castillejos or Piriz Alvez, being like a poacher and defining inside the box, near the small box. If he scores but before that he misses 4 goals in a good position, so why he should have more than just greens? That's not necessary, it'd be overrate him.

Ithink that 76 won't overrate him but its's just my opinion, it's not a big change (Piriz Alves's 77 in SA). I'd improve his response to 81 too. His Attack is fine in 80 (same as Pratto and Maggiollo), he doesn't deserve more there, I was wrong. About ST could be +1 too.

[xeneize]

i'd go for better ATT, he's practically pure ATT, positioning and movements, he make goals only cause that, because in shoots he's not good
in this aspect is better than Pratto, are diferent styles, Pratto is overal better maybe, but not in ATT

[nachogr28]

i'd go for better ATT, he's practically pure ATT, positioning and movements, he make goals only cause that, because in shoots he's not good
in this aspect is better than Pratto, are diferent styles, Pratto is overal better maybe, but not in ATT

Pratto's great in attacking positions. But maybe are both underrated. And they're different players, yes. Blandi is a "goal poacher" and Pratto a "chasing back)

[Mariano_11]

Well, you can say, thanks to the brave could tie a game, but had several chances and failed to realize, maybe it has lack of confidence or that a mood not very good, his positioning is incredible is coupled to the moves quickly and is always well placed .. can not be really his lack of scoring ... I was surprised by his leap, but having a pretty good height, jumping ability is amazing, beating several times fontanini and bovaglio, also holding the ball at all times, I think your STA is somewhat high, taking into account the changes regarding STA sets, no evil would see a green number STA

[Vickingo]

I always said it, his definitions mostly sucks since his time in Argentinos, he has an insane sense of positioning and awesome shoot technique. But his SP/SA are crap. Agree in decrease his stamina a bit.

[Mariano_11]

wonder you have so many chances and not take advantage of the know, I remember when he played in reserve, I put all I think if I remember in a game scoring 4 goals in 10 minutes ...

[xeneize]

again i'm almost sure his "weakness" in shoots are cause hi bad ST, today when he made a "clean" conection he shoot a really powerfull shoot to the post, but ussually he fail with his conections and cause that his shoots are weak and sometimes with no good ubicatiion, he just impact teh ball in a bad way with his foot

[Vickingo]

Actually I'm saying the opposite, his ST always been far better than his SA/SP which suck.

[xeneize]

well, are 2 vs 1 so he's going to have what you said ladies (i'm going to keep hm with SA>ST in my OF )

i'm working in a set, if don't bother you i can post it here, practically have teh last suggestions of you both

[Vickingo]

No problem, just giving my thoughts of him, but tbh are really clear watching him since his Argentinos' days. His maximmium expression was in last goal, pure ST without any kind of SA/SP. Currently I'm using 75-73-81 and tbh that makes him act like irl.

[Vickingo]

This guy is amazing in terms of scoring goals and take advantage of the opportunities that Falcioni gives to him...probably today's goal was the 1st one in his whole career that he spent some kind of power in his shoot, and tbh wasn't so strong as he was inside the box, also the ball went to the middle of the goal...but he's there to score always.

[Mariano_11]

if it is a fox in the area, always there and has any chance, like all CF, but it is amazing that every time you play, check goals ..

[Paablito]

Vs Union
Good positioning, had to put up with two big defenders like Avendaño and Correa. He scoring again, classic CF he is in the box all the time
I think he deserves a decrease of TEC, TW (maybe in with) and a little increased of SP, BAL

[Vickingo]

Again as I said million of times he's a clear poacher who shows a FAR better st than sa. Also resp could be a little higher. But man he's so slow with the ball, reached with ease. I repeat I have 75-73-81 in SA/SP/ST

[lucashag]

do you think the card goal poacher could suit him??

[Vickingo]

Yeah actually I suggested it before...i'm almost sure.

[lucashag]

injury tolerance should be C, and cond 5

[Davidk98]

Without a doubt, deserves in attack a 82/83. Why? The results are in sight.




Please, deleted the two previous messages. It was three times.Sorry.